Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63086 CO) doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e63086 open access Research Article Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone of Astraeus from a dry deciduous forest of Shorea Vineet Vishal*:$, Somnath Singh Munda?, Geetanjali Singh*, Shalini Lal* + Department of Botany, Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University, Ranchi-834008, India § Department of Botany, Bangabasi Evening College, Kolkata-700009, India Corresponding author: Shalini Lal (shalini.kumari@gmail.com) Academic editor: Vesela Evtimova Received: 13 Jan 2021 | Accepted: 26 Apr 2021 | Published: 19 May 2021 Citation: Vishal V, Munda SS, Singh G, Lal S (2021) Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone of Astraeus from a dry deciduous forest of Shorea. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63086. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e63086 Abstract The plant microbiome has been considered one of the most researched areas of microbial biodiversity, yet very little information is available on the microbial communities prevailing in the mushroom's ectomycorrhizosphere. Ectomycorrhizal symbioses often result in the formation of a favourable niche which enables the thriving of various microbial symbionts where these symbionts endorse functions, such as quorum sensing, biofilm formation, volatile microbial compound (VOC) production, regulation of microbial gene expression, symbiosis and virulence. The identification of hidden uncultured microbial communities around the active ectomycorrhizal zone of Astraeus from dry deciduous sal forest of Jharkhand, India was carried out using MinION Oxford Nanopore sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons genes. High richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (1,905 OTUs) was observed. We recorded 25 distinct phyla. Proteobacteria (36%) was the most abundant phylum, followed by Firmicutes (28%), Actinobacteria (10%) and Bacteroidetes (6%), whereas Gammaproteobacteria was the most abundant class of bacterial communities in the active ectomycorrhizal zone. The ectomycorrhizosphere soil has abundant phosphate- solubilising bacteria (PSB). This is the first report of the ectomycorrhizosphere microbiome associated with Astraeus. © Vishal V et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Vishal V et al Keywords Astraeus, Ectomycorrhizae, Gammaproteobacteria, microbiome, PSB, OTUs Introduction Mycorrhizal symbioses are ubiquitous and form a major component of the microbiota in most boreal, temperate and dry deciduous tropical forest ecosystems. They contribute huge amounts of organic carbon fluxes from leaf-litter, wood or plant biomass, resulting in an enrichment of the microbial populace and their associated functions. The ectomycorrhizosphere is a zone of active interchange between plant root and soil microorganisms (ectomycorrhizal fungi and bacteria) that can inhibit or stimulate each other (Poole et al. 2001). The ectomycorrhizosphere also serves as a nutritional hotspot for microbes which benefit forest trees in a number of ways. Moreover, the ectomycorrhizosphere microbiome is driving processes like quorum sensing, regulation of microbial gene expression, symbiosis, biofilm formation, antibiotic production, motility, conjugation, virulence etc. (Churchland and Grayston 2014). Garbaye (1994) and Bonfante and Anca (2009) suggested that bacteria could potentially stimulate mycorrhizal formation, assist in the fungal-plant recognition system and receptivity of the host root to the mycorrhizal fungus. Uroz et al. (2007), Uroz and Oger (2015) isolated 61 bacterial strains from the ectomycorrhizosphere of an oak forest, where they have experimentally shown that bacteria (Burkholderia, Collimonas, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (Scleroderma citrinum) are jointly involved in mineral weathering and solubilisation processes. Mushrooms are one of the finest creations in nature and exhibit wide variation. The wild edible mushrooms of Astraeus Phosri. (order Boletales), inhabiting the roots of Shorea robusta Gaertn., are a group of epigeous non-hygroscopic macro fungi found only during the monsoon season. They are recognised by the star-like pattern at maturity (Phosri et al. 2007) and are commonly known as earthstar. These ectomycorrhizal edible fungi grow extensively in the sandy and red laterite soil of Dipterocarp sal dry deciduous forest. Owing to their high nutritional property, these mushrooms are sold regularly in local markets during the monsoon season. However, due to changes in climatic conditions, decrease in rainfall, global warming and unauthorised anthropogenic influence, the production is declining rapidly, causing serious threats to these mushrooms. Although there are many reports on the morphology, photochemistry and nutritional property of Astraeus, little is known about the effect of bacteria on the growth and development of mushrooms of Astraeus. This may be one of the reasons that, despite nearly a decade of research, attempts to cultivate Astraeus have largely been unsuccessful (Trappe 1967, Petcharat 2003, Biswas et al. 2017, Biswas et al. 2011). A detailed study on the biology and fruiting body production of Astraeus in a forest of sal and the co-occurrence between this fungus and other microbes (especially bacteria), is very important for a successful cultivation of mushroom and for a better yield. The main objective of the present work was to collect soil samples from a dry deciduous sal forest Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone ... 3 and to analyse the abundance of microorganisms around the ectomycorrhizosphere of Astraeus. In order to evaluate the optimum microbial content for proper nourishment of the taxon, the MinlION Oxford Nanopore 16s amplicon sequencing platform was used. Material and Methods Collection and sample preparation Rhizosphere samples of ectomycorrhizosphere (RUGA-1) were collected from the village of Bandgaon under the Porahat forest division, West Singhbhum, Jharkhand, India ( 22.84°N, 85.35°E; Fig. 1) from a dry deciduous forest of Shorea during the monsoon season in July 2019. The soil in this region is red laterite and sandy, having a thin organic layer. The soil samples (n = 3) were collected at a depth of 5-10 cm. The separation of the soil samples into ectomycorrhizosphere were performed in the lab. Plant roots were carefully eliminated from the soil and shaken gently to remove loosely adhering soil. Ectomycorrhizosphere soils were sieved (2 mm mesh) and homogenised prior to freezing (Uroz et al. 2010). [a | ‘Sahibganj Godda \ DISTRICT OF WEST SINGHBHUM 0 250 500 1.000 Km 5 Le Ee Figure 1. EES] Area of study and collection of soil samples. A. Location and collection sites of soil samples from Porahat forest division (22.84°N, 85.35°E) of West Singhbhum District of Jharkhand State of India; B. Satellite image of the collection site; C. Natural vegetation of forest of Shorea from Porahat forest division; D-E. Collection of ectomycorrhizosphere soil samples. Scale bar C-D = 20 mm. DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing From a minimum of 1 g of soil, DNA was isolated using the EXpure Microbial DNA isolation kit (BogarBio Bee stores Pvt Ltd). DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Vishal V et al Flurometer 3.0 and DNA was stored at -20°C. Full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492R = (5'- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'). Metagenomic 16s amplicon sequencing was performed by taking 1 ug of DNA template using MinlION Oxford Nanopore platform at Yaaz Xenomics (Coimbatore, India). The raw fastq files were uploaded to the metagenome rapid annotation using subsystem technology (MG-RAST server; see Aziz et al. 2008) and annotated using default parameters. Artificial duplicate reads were eliminated using DRISEE (Duplicate Read Inferred Sequencing Error Estimation; see Gomez-Alvarez et al. 2009). Taxonomic assignment of the ectomycorrhizosphere reads were performed with the analysis tools provided by MG-RAST, using the Greengenes (DeSantis et al. 2006), RDP (Cole et al. 2014) and SILVA SSU (Quast et al. 2012). As a reference database, we used a minimum cut-off identity of 60% and e-value of 5. The final taxonomy was decided, based on the best BLAST match for given representative sequence reads of the above dataset. The metagenome data are available at the NCBI - Sequence Read Archive with accession number: SRX8009931. Results After QC and deduplication, a total of 50,213 reads with size 13,969,056 bp with an average length of 278 bp and G+C% 50+4 dataset were recovered from the active zone of ectomycorrhizosphere (RUGA-1). Taxonomic assignment was performed with the analysis tools provided by MG-RAST, using the SILVA SSU as a reference database with the default parameters, as it provides maximum number of matched reads, based on the BLAST score compared with RDP and Greengenes databases (Table 1). High species richness was observed in ectomycorrhizosphere. The reads were clustered using > 97% sequence identity to 1,905 microbial OTUs, which were classified and represented 24 bacterial and one archaeal phyla. Table 1. Summary statistics table. Reads Sequences bp Count Mean Seq. Mean No. of hits- No. of hits No. of hits - Count Length GC % Greengenes -RDP Silva SSU Pre-QC = 59,358 18,009,487 3034191 bp 504+4% 15,943 24,505 28,806 bp Post-QC 50,213 13,969,056 278+199bp 50+4% bp Bacteria were further classified into 45 classes, 103 orders and 224 families (Fig. 2). The most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria (36%), followed by Firmicutes (28%), Actinobacteria (10%) and Bacteroidetes (6%) (Fig. 3). In the active ectomycorrhizosphere zone, the most abundant superphylum Proteobacteria comprised of Gammaproteobacteria (28%), Alphaproteobacteria (4.5%), Deltaproteobacteria (1.3%), Betaproteobacteria (1.29%) and Epsilonproteobacteria (0.1%) (Fig. 3B), whereas Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly more frequent. Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone ... Figure 2. EES Krona chart of taxonomic affiliation of ectomycorrhizosphere and their relative abundance. The inner circle represents the higher taxonomic rank, while the outer circle represents a lower taxonomic rank up to the species level. 2A ENRICHED BACTERIAL PHYLUM Figure 3. EES ® Proteobacteria = Finmicutes @ unclassified (derived from Bacteria) ® Actinobacteria ® Bacteroidetes ® Acidobacteria 8 Cyanobacteria @ Planctomycetes = Tenericutes ™ Spirochaetes ® Gemunatimonadetes @ Synergistetes ® Verrucomicrobia ®@ Nitrospirae ® Chloroflexi ® Deinococcus-Thermus = Chlamydiae ™ Fusobacteria § Deferribacteres =Chlorobi @ Aquificae ®Dictyoglomi ® Thermotogae @ Candidatus Poribacteria @ Crenarchacota 2B 1.00 090 B® Alphaproteobacteria WB Betaproteodactena 0.80 1 Detaproteobacteria 070 @ Epstionproteovactena HH Gammaproteobacteria 0.60 unclassified (derived from Proteobacteria) 0.50 040 0.30 020 0.10 0.00 > -) wo 2c 1.00 0.90 B Acidithiobaciiaies B® Avromonadaies 0.80 Ateromonadaies 070 @ Cardiobactenales Chromatiates 0.60 @ Enterodactensles @ Legionetales a @ Methylococcaies 0.40 © Oc0anospintiaies B@ Pasteureliaies 09 Pseudomonadales 020 @ Thictrcnales ® Virionaes 0.10 @ Xanthomonadaies sis I unclassified (derived trom Gammaproteobacteria) A wr Taxonomic coverage of the ectomycorrhizosphere of Astraeus. A. Pie-chart showing the distribution of enriched microbial phyla; B. Stacked bar showing the distribution of relative abundant classes of Proteobacteria; C. Stacked bar showing of distribution of most relative abundant families of Gammaproteobacteria. 6 Vishal V et al Few members of Cyanobacteria and Archaea (Crenarchaeota) and pathogenic bacteria, such as Escherichia, Salmonella, Vibrio, Helicobacter, Klebsiella and Shigella were also identified in the study. A higher number of genera were identified in the active zone of ectomycorrhizosphere (n = 652). The most abundant species from the ectomycorrhizosphere was the Gram-negative rod-shaped Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.2%) of Gammaproteobacteria, followed by the Gram-positive rod-shaped Lactobacillus delbrueckii (5%) of Firmicutes (Fig. 2). A number of significant reads fell under uncultured/ unclassified OTUs (Suppl. material 1). Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first high-resolution study of microbial diversity and their distribution in the active zone of the ectomycorrhizosphere of wild edible mushrooms of Astraeus from a dry deciduous forest of Shorea found in the red and sandy laterite soil with pH ranges from 5.0 to 6.0. In this study, we explored the abundance of microorganisms around the ectomycorrhizosphere and the hidden uncultured microbial communities. Such studies serve as baseline information for future research on the dynamics and distribution of microbial communities and how they relate to the physical environment and resilience. Mogge et al. (2000) and Khetmalas et al. (2002) reported that bacteria are common inhabitants in the mycorrhizosphere and they are more abundant in the mycorrhizosphere as compared to the bulk soil. The most abundant class was methanotrophs of Gammaproteobacteria of phylum Proteobacteria (Fig. 3B and C). They play a vital role in phosphorus and iron mobilisation and are believed to be involved in mineral weathering and in plant- nutrition control as demonstrated by K6berl et al. (2017). Gammaproteobacteria contain members of the bacterial family, which are both medically and ecologically important. Pseudomonadaceae, Vibrionaceae, Halomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae were the most abundant families of Gammaproteobacteria (Fig. 3C). Pseudomonas aeruginosa is Gram-negative Gammaproteobacteria, rod-shaped, asporogenous, aerobic, opportunistic pathogen, which degrades polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and participates in biofilm formation and quorum sensing pathways (Botzenhart and Doring 1993). Firmicutes were very widely spread and abundant in the ectomycorrhizosphere soil. Lactobacillus delbrueckii is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped plant growth-promoting Firmicute that is active in the utilisation of recalcitrant carbon and inorganic nutrients (Llado et al. (2017). Ecological processes of forest communities, though, are associated with microbes, yet, bacterial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere in forests have not been explored vis-a- vis grassland or agricultural systems. Several phyla and classes in this study have been found to dominate ectomycorrhizosphere bacterial communities. The comparative analysis of the data reveals similar bacterial community structure as reported in previous metagenomic assemblies from the ectomycorrhizosphere of oak forest (Uroz et al. 2012) and boreal forest (Pent et al. 2017), except for the abundance of Pseudomonas. The soils of ectomycorrhizosphere are rich in phosphate-solubilising bacteria, primarily of Bacillus, Arthrobacterium, Agrobacterium, Micrococcus, Enterobacterium, Vibrio, Serbia, Rhizobium, Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone ... 7 Aeromonas, Burkholderia and Pseudomonas (Liu 2019). Burke et al. (2008) reported ectomycorrhizosphere metagenome from Douglas fir EcM root tips, where EcM was dominated by Alphaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Kataoka et al. (2012) observed Sphingomonas and Acidobacterium as abundant taxa in the pine mushroom Tricholoma from a forest of Picea abies. Stursova et al. (2012) reported Betaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Acidobacteria as an abundant phyla. Similarly, Uroz et al. (2012) have also reported an abundance of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes from an oak forest, while Sphingomonas and Alphaproteobacteria from boreal forests were recorded by Pent et al. (2017) as abundant. However, in our investigation, we observed the highest abundance of Gammaproteobacteria, followed by Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Previous studies of the metagenome of ecomycorrhizosphere of different soil types such as sandy, clay, loamy and podzol showed that soil types have a strong effect on the shape and structure of the rhizospheric microbiome of various environments, which may explain the taxonomic variations between them. Conclusion Thus, the soil metagenomic analyses of the ectomycorrhizosphere, associated with wild mushrooms of Astraeus, revealed a distinct and unique assemblage of methanotrophic Gammaproteobacteria. However, other prokaryotic affiliates with a high percentage of unassigned taxa indicate scarce knowledge in the diversity of ectomycorrhizospheric communities. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the Head of Department of Botany, DSPMU, Ranchi and Mr Piyush Lugun, Mr Stephan Nag, Mrs Rajni Nag and Mrs Julia Horo, for their help during sample collection. Author contributions SL, GS and VV conceptualised the ideas and devised the project. VV and SSM were involved in research and investigation process specially, to sample collection and performing experiments. Critical feedback was provided by all the authors in shaping the research, analysis and manuscript. SL gave final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version. Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. 8 Vishal V et al References ° Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 ° Biswas G, Rana §S, Sarkar S, Acharya K (2011) Cardioprotective activity of ethanolic extract of Astraeus hygrometricus (Pers.) Morg. Pharmacologyonline 2: 808-817. ° Biswas G, Nandi S, Kuila D, Acharya K (2017) A comprehensive review on food and medicinal prospects of Astraeus hygrometricus. Pharmacognosy Journal 9 (6): 799-806. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2017.6.125 ° Bonfante P, Anca | (2009) Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: a network of interactions. Annual Review of Microbiology 63 (1): 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.micro.091208.073504 ° Botzenhart K, Déring G (1993) Ecology and epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Campa M, Bendinelli M, Friedman H, et al. (Eds) Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an Opportunistic Pathogen. 1. Springer, Boston, MA., 1-18 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4615-3036-7 1 ° Burke DJ, Dunham SM, Kretzer AM (2008) Molecular analysis of bacterial communities associated with the roots of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) colonized by different ectomycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 65 (2): 299-309. hitps://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00491.x ° Churchland C, Grayston SJ (2014) Specificity of plant-microbe interactions in the tree mycorrhizosphere biome and consequences for soil C cycling. Frontiers in Microbiology 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00261 ° Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM (2014) Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 42 (D1). hitos://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gkt1244 ° DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 (7): 5069-5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05 ° Garbaye J (1994) Mycorrhization helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Acta Botanica Gallica: Botany Letters 141 (4): 517-521. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04003.x ° Gomez-Alvarez V, Teal TK, Schmidt TM (2009) Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities. The ISME Journal 3 (11): 1314-1317. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.72 ° Kataoka R, Siddiqui ZA, Kikuchi J, Ando M, Sriwati R, Nozaki A, Futai K (2012) Detecting nonculturable bacteria in the active mycorrhizal zone of the pine mushroom Tricholoma matsutake. The Journal of Microbiology 50 (2): 199-206. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12275-012-1371-7 ° Khetmalas MB, Egger KN, Massicotte HB, Tackaberry LE, Clapperton MJ (2002) Bacterial diversity associated with subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) ectomycorrhizae following wildfire and salvage-logging in central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48 (7): 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1139/w02-056 Cataloguing the bacterial diversity in the active ectomycorrhizal zone ... 9 Koberl M, Dita M, Martinuz A, Staver C, Berg G (2017) Members of Gammaproteobacteria as indicator species of healthy banana plants on Fusarium wilt- infested fields in Central America. Scientific Reports 7 https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep45318 Liu S (2019) Identification and characterization of the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in reclamation soil in Shanxi, China. Frontiers in Microbiology 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02171 Llado S, Lopez-Mondejar R, Baldrian P (2017) Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 81 (2). htips://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00063-16 Mogge B, Loferer C, Agerer R, Hutzler P, Hartmann A (2000) Bacterial community structure and colonization patterns of Fagus sylvatica L. ectomycorrhizospheres as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Mycorrhiza 9 (5): 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009991 Pent M, Podmaa K, Bahram M (2017) Bacterial communities in boreal forest mushrooms are shaped both by soil parameters and host identity. Frontiers in Microbiology 8< a field_id="30" href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00836" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.201 7.00836 Petcharat V (2003) Edible Astraeus (Basidiomycota) from Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 23 (4): 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2003.tb00423.x Phosri C, Martin MP, Sihanonth P, Whalley AJ, Watling R (2007) Molecular study of the genus Astraeus. Mycological Research 111 (3): 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.mycres.2007.01.004 Poole EJ, Bending GD, Whipps JM, Read DJ (2001) Bacteria associated with Pinus sylvestris—Lactarius rufus ectomycorrhizas and their effects on mycorrhiza formation in vitro. New Phytologist 151 (3): 743-751. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x. 2001.00219.x Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2012) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research 41 (D1): D590-D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks1219 Stursova M, Zifcakova L, Leigh MB, Burgess R, Baldrian P (2012) Cellulose utilization in forest litter and soil: identification of bacterial and fungal decomposers. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 80 (3): 735-746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01343.x Trappe JM (1967) Pure culture synthesis of Douglas-fir mycorrhizae with species of Hebeloma, Suillus, Rhizopogon, and Astraeus. Forest Science 13 (2): 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/13.2.121 Uroz S, Calvaruso C, Turpault M, Pierrat J, Mustin C, Frey-Klett P (2007) Effect of the mycorrhizosphere on the genotypic and metabolic diversity of the bacterial communities involved in mineral weathering in a forest soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73 (9): 3019-3027. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00121-07 Uroz S, Buee M, Murat C, Frey-Klett P, Martin F (2010) Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. Environmental Microbiology Reports 2 (2): 281-288. httos://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1758-2229.2009.00117.x Uroz S, Oger P, Morin E, Frey-Klett P (2012) Distinct ectomycorrhizospheres share similar bacterial communities as revealed by pyrosequencing-based analysis of 16S 10 Vishal V et al rRNA genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78 (8): 3020-3024. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.06742-11 ° Uroz S, Oger P (2015) Draft genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. strain PML1 (12), an ectomycorrhizosphere-inhabiting bacterium with effective mineral-weathering ability. Genome Announcements 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00798-15 Supplementary material Suppl. material 1: RUGA-1 EE} Authors: VV, SSM, GS and SL Data type: Genomic Brief description: Taxonomic profiling of ectomycorrhizosphere soil. Download file (148.10 kb)