Research Article Journal of Orthoptera Research 2023, 32(1): 1-24 The calling songs of some katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) from the tropical forests of Southeast Asia MING KAI TAN, JACOB DUNCAN2,, RODZAY BIN HAJ! ABDUL WAHAB?, CHOW-YANG LEE*, RAzZY JAPIRS, ArtHur Y.C. CHUNG?®, JESSICA B. BAROGA-BARBECHOS, SHERYL A. YAP”®, FERNANDO MONTEALEGRE-Z? 1 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore. 2 School of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Green Lane, Lincoln, LN6 7DL, UK. 3 Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Universiti, BE1410, Tungku, Brunei. 4 Department of Entomology, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. 5 Forest Research Centre (Sepilok), Sabah Forestry Department, PO Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. 6 Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Extension, University of the Philippines Los Banos, College, Laguna, 4031 Los Banos, Philippines. 7 Institute of Weed Science, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos, College, Laguna, 4031 Los Banos, Philippines. 8 Museum of Natural History, University of the Philippines Los Bafios, College, Laguna, 4031 Los Bafios, Philippines. Corresponding authors: Ming Kai Tan (orthoptera.mingkai@gmail.com), Fernando Montealegre-Z (fmontealegrez@lincoln.ac.uk) Academic editor: Laurel B. Symes | Received 29 March 2022 | Accepted 18 June 2022 | Published 16 January 2023 https://zoobank. org/547B474B-C425-4C6E-B729-0936733D1BC0 Citation: Tan MK, Duncan J, Wahab RHA, Lee C-Y, Japir R, Chung AYC, Baroga-Barbecho JB, Yap SA, Montealegre-Z F (2023) The calling songs of some katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) from the tropical forests of Southeast Asia. Journal of Orthoptera Research 32(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ jor.32.84563 Abstract Katydids produce sound for signaling and communication by stridula- tion of the tegmina. Unlike crickets, most katydids are known to sing at ultrasonic frequencies. This has drawn interest in the investigation of the biophysics of ultrasonic sound production, detection, evolution, and ecol- ogy (including predator-prey interactions) of these katydids. However, most of these studies are based on species from the Neotropics, while little is known about katydid species from the hyperdiverse region of South- east Asia. To address this, a concerted effort to document, record, and describe the calling songs of Southeast Asian katydids, especially species that call at ultrasonic frequencies, was made. A study spanning two years (2018-2020) in the Malay Peninsula (Singapore and Malaysia), Borneo (Brunei Darussalam and Sabah), and the Philippines revealed previously unknown calls of 24 katydid species from four subfamilies. The calling songs of Southeast Asian katydid species are highly diversified in terms of time and frequency. Call structure can range from isolated syllables (e.g., Holochlora), continuous trills (e.g., Axylus philippinus), to short pulse-trains (e.g., Euanisous teuthroides) and complex echemes (e.g., Conocephalus spp.), with 87.5% of species having ultrasonic peak frequencies and 12.5% be- ing considered extreme ultrasonic callers (peak frequency >40 kHz). The call spectrum ranges from tonal (e.g., spectral entropy is 6.8 in Casigneta sp. 2) to resonant (entropy is 8.8 in Conocephalus cognatus). Of the 24 spe- cies whose calls are described here, we imaged and described the sound- producing structures of 18. This study provides a preliminary overview of the acoustic diversity of katydids in Southeast Asia, and the authors hope to inspire further investigation into the bioacoustics of little-known katy- dids from these areas. Amassing a database of calling songs and sound- producing organ illustrations from different species is important to ad- dress taxonomic impediments while advancing our knowledge about the bioacoustics of Southeast Asian katydids. * These authors contributed equally as co-first authors. Keywords acoustics, calls, frequency, stridulation, Tettigoniidae, ultrasound sound-producing organs, Introduction Katydids are a highly speciose group of insects (Mugleston et al. 2018) known for using acoustic signals for communication. Different species can produce very different calling songs in terms of the temporal (e.g., duration, period, call structure) and frequency (e.g., peak frequency, tonality) domains. Females can use such calling songs to discriminate between conspecific and heterospecific males (Morris et al. 1994, Heller 1995, Morris 1999, Heller and Hemp 2020). For example, some katydids produce songs at frequencies as low as 0.6 kHz (e.g., Tympanophyllum arcufolium (Haan, 1843); see Heller 1995), whereas other species can call at as high as 150 kHz (e.g., Supersonus aequoreus Sarria-S. et al., 2014; see Sarria-S et al. 2014). Compared to crickets, which generally produce low frequencies (with few exceptions, such as lebinthines; see Robillard et al. 2007 and Tan et al. 2021), such vast frequency variation makes katydids an ideal subject for studying acoustic communication and its evolution. Katydids generate sounds through stridulation (Morris and Pipher 1967, Bailey 1970, Ewing 1989, Chivers et al. 2014). Typically, the sound is generated when the scraper on the right teg- men makes contact with the teeth on the stridulatory file of the left tegmen within a cycle of wing movement (Walker and Dew 1972, JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 2 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Morris 1999, Bennet-Clark 2003). In some katydids, the velocity at which the scraper passes through the teeth and the density of the teeth dictate the peak frequency of the species calling song, although the mirror area on the right tegmen can also play a role in dictating peak frequency (Bailey 1967, Montealegre-Z 2012, Chivers et al. 2014). However, it is not mechanically possible for katydids to move their tegmina at the velocity needed to produce extreme ultrasound (>40 kHz). Instead, to generate much higher frequency calls than wing movement velocity would allow, the scraper of some katydid species is loaded with resilin and deform- able, allowing elastic energy to be stored and released (Morris et al. 1994, Montealegre-Z et al. 2006). Many katydids emit ultrasonic frequency in their calling songs (e.g., Bailey 1967, 1970, Morris and Pipher 1967), with currently more than 70% documented as singing at ultrasonic frequencies (>20 kHz), with some species reaching extreme ul- trasonic frequencies (>40 kHz) (Mason et al. 1991, Montealegre- Z et al. 2017). When compared to low-frequency calls typically produced by crickets, the generation of ultrasonic songs by katydids has clear advantages and disadvantages (Morris et al. 1994, Montealegre-Z et al. 2006). Ultrasound has enhanced directionality and radiation efficiency, allowing males to find mates and be located by females more readily while avoiding detection by predators (Mason and Bailey 1998). For pure-tone callers, another advantage is the ability to avoid eavesdropping by predators, particularly bats (Belwood and Morris 1987). On the other hand, the decay of energy in ultrasound is more rapid, thus reducing the broadcasting distance (ROmer and Lewald 1992). Therefore, the ecological and evolutionary consequences of generating ultrasonic songs make these katydids interesting study subjects. The study of the ecology and evolution of ultrasonic-singing katydids—including the documentation and description of calls (e.g., Montealegre-Z and Morris 1999; ter Hofstede et al. 2020); the systematics (e.g., Siarra-S et al. 2014, 2016, Chamorro-Rengifo et al. 2014, Chamorro-Rengifo and Braun 2016, Chamorro-Rengi- fo and Olivier 2017); the biomechanics of sound production (e.g., Morris et al. 1994, Montealegre-Z and Mason 2005, Montealegre- Z et al. 2006, 2017), predator-prey interaction between bats and katydids (e.g., Libersat and Hoy 1991; ter Hofstede et al. 2010), and sexual selection (e.g., Bailey and Gwynne 1988, Mason and Bailey 1998)—has traditionally been focused on species from the neotropics, with the acoustic communication of Southeast Asian orthopterans being less well studied (but see e.g., Heller 1995, In- grisch 1995, 1998, Riede 1996, 1997, Tan 2011, Heller et al. 2017, 2021a; Tan et al. 2019b, 2020a). Despite Southeast Asia being one of the noisiest places due to the high diversity of calling insects, many species are still unknown and require taxonomic descrip- tion and revision (Tan et al. 2017). Beyond their original descrip- tions, little is known about the biology of many katydid species in Southeast Asia. While taxonomy is crucial for accurate identification and cata- loging of bioacoustics data for studies on ecology, behavior, and evolution, the use of bioacoustics can also help overcome taxo- nomic impediment. Recent studies have demonstrated that the calling songs of Southeast Asian katydids can be used to resolve taxonomic problems related to species complexes. Heller et al. (2017) used calling songs to classify cryptic species within the Ducetia japonica species group. Previously thought to be a widely distributed species, it has been determined that different regions harbor different cryptic species. Tan et al. (2020a) and Heller et al. (2021a) combined calling songs and stridulatory anatomy to address species delineation in Lipotactes alienus-cum-virescens and Mecopoda elongata species complexes. In the case of Lipotactes Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1898, Tan et al. (2020a) provided a foun- dation for the further taxonomic progress of these little-known katydids from Southeast Asia (Ingrisch 2021, Gorochov 2021). These examples demonstrate the importance of combining bio- acoustics and traditional taxonomy to identify species of katydids from Southeast Asia. This study aimed to initiate a database containing acoustic and morphological data of Southeast Asian katydids. To docu- ment the previously unknown calling songs of Southeast Asian katydids, we opportunistically collected 24 species from Singa- pore and other parts of Southeast Asia, recorded their calling songs under ex-situ conditions, and accurately identified and systematically vouchered the specimens. Given the importance of the morphology of sound-producing organs in dictating key acoustic parameters (e.g., peak frequency and resonance) (Morris and Pipher 1967, Bailey 1970, Montealegre-Z 2009, Montealegre-Z and Postles 2010), we also made images of the sound-producing organs to complement the calling song de- scription. These data can be incorporated into traditional tax- onomy and/or used for meta-analysis to overcome taxonomic impediments while advancing our knowledge about the acoustic communication of these katydids. Materials and methods Collection and husbandry of katydids.—Katydids were opportunis- tically collected by sight (mostly at night but occasionally in the day) from six sites in the Malay Peninsula, Borneo, and the Phil- ippines: (1) Singapore from August 2018 to December 2019 and from June to August 2020; (2) Pulau Tioman, Johor, Peninsular Malaysia from 7 to 9 August 2018; (3) Belait and Temburong, Brunei Darussalam from 6 to 18 July 2019; (4) Sandakan, Sabah, East Malaysia from 7 to 12 January 2019 and 30 September to 4 October 2019; and (5) Laguna, Luzon, the Philippines from 11 to 13 May and 6 to 8 September 2019. Whenever possible, in-situ images were taken using a Canon EOS 500D digital SLR camera with a compact macro lens EF 100 mm f/2.8 Macro USM, and a Canon Macro Twin Lite MT-24EX was used for lighting and flash. The katydids were kept in insect cages. To avoid dehydration, wet cotton balls were provided, cages were covered with a wet cloth, and/or regular spraying was done. The katydids were sub- jected to light:dark hours corresponding to the locations where they were caught. They were generally fed with Pedigree Adult Chicken and Vegetables (18% protein, 10% fat, 5% fiber, no salt) or SmartHeart Puppy Beef and Milk Flavor (26% protein, 10% fat, 4% fiber, 10% moisture with salt) dog food (sometimes crushed). Fruits were also occasionally provided. Meconematinae were fed with living Drosophila fruit flies. Acoustic recordings and analysis.—Acoustic recording and analysis generally followed that of Tan et al. (2019b, 2020a). All record- ings were obtained in laboratory conditions or biological stations in the dark. The calling song of an isolated male placed inside a standardized insect cage (25 cm in diameter and 33 cm tall) witha nylon cover was sampled at a frequency of 256 kHz-samples/s us- ing a Echo Meter Touch or Echo Meter Touch Pro 2 sensor (based on Knowles FG sensor). The recorder was placed horizontally and JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. 3 at about 2-5 m away from the cage (depending on the loudness of the call to avoid clipping the recording). It should, however, be noted that with this type of microphone, a recording distance of less than 2 m is preferred to minimize distortion of the tempo- ral structure of the signal. The triggered recording was used with the trigger minimum frequency set to 20 kHz. However, this was only a trigger and did not affect the quality of the recording at lower frequencies (i.e., <20 kHz). The recorded signals were saved in 12-bit and 16-bit WAV formats for Echo Meter Touch or Echo Meter Touch Pro 2 sensor, respectively. Ambient temperature was logged using a HOBO 8K Pendant Temperature logger (model: UA-001-08, Onset, Bourne, MA), or a temperature-humidity me- ter (Smartsensor AR867, Arco Science and Technology Limited, Dongguan, PRC). The basic katydid song terminology follows Baker and Chesmore (2020): Calling song = spontaneous song produced by an isolated male to attract a female; Chirp = a type of echeme consisting of a few definite syllables; Echeme = a first-order assemblage of syllables; Echeme sequence = a first-order assemblage of echemes; Interval = silent interval between calls and/or pulses, or downtime; Peak frequency = frequency with the highest energy from the mean spectrum; Period = interval between the start of successive units (e.g., syl- lable, echeme); Pulse = a single unbroken wave train, isolated in time, produced by the impact of each tooth; Pulse train = a series of pulses isolated in time; Syllable = single complete stridulatory movement (i.e., opening and closing of wings). Since wing movement was not exam- ined, the term syllable is used here as an assemblage of pulses isolated in time and likely to correspond to a single complete stridulatory movement; Trill = a type of echeme consisting of many syllables. We also used spectral entropy to estimate signal heterogene- ity, in which a low value indicates highly tonal signals and a high value indicates broad-band signals (Chivers et al. 2017a). Parameters of the temporal domain (e.g., call duration/ pe- riod and interval) were measured manually using Raven Lite 2.0.0. For frequency domain parameters, custom-written scripts in MAT- LAB (R2019a; MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, United States) were used. This involved determining 2048 Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) lines, Q_,, and Q _,, entropy, spread and flatness. Specimen curation and identification.—The specimens were pre- served in absolute analytical-grade ethanol and later pinned and dry preserved. For future molecular work, a single hind leg from each specimen was also preserved in absolute analytical-grade ethanol. The katydids were identified using taxonomic papers, in- cluding Willemse (1959), Jin (1992), Ingrisch (1995, 1998, 2015), Gorochov (1998, 2008, 2011, 2013), Tan and Ingrisch (2014), Tan (2014, 2017), Tan et al. (2015, 2018, 2019a), Tan and Artchawa- kom (2017), Jin et al. (2020), and by comparing them with photo- graphs of type specimens. Taxonomists, specifically Xing-bao Jin, Sigfrid Ingrisch, and Andrei Gorochov, were also consulted. Sound-producing structure.—The left and right tegmina were dis- sected whenever possible. Three-dimensional images of the stridulatory file on the left tegmen and sound-producing organs on the right tegmen were obtained with infinite focus microscopy using an Alicona Infinite Focus (model G5) microscope (OPTI- MAX Imaging Inspection and Measurement Limited, Leicester- shire, UK). Depositories.— FRC Forest Research Center, Sepilok, Sabah, East Malaysia UBDM Universiti Brunei Darussalam Museum, Brunei Darussalam UPLBMNH_ University of the Philippines Los Banos, Museum of Natural History, Philippines ZRC Zoological Reference Collection, Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Singapore The sound files were deposited in the Orthoptera Species File (OSF) Online Version 5.0/5.0 (Cigliano et al. 2022). Results Summary.—In total, 37 individual katydids were collected. Of these, the calling songs of 24 species from 20 genera of the sub- families Conocephalinae (nine species), Lipotactinae (one spe- cies), Meconematinae (seven species), and Phaneropterinae (sev- en species) were recorded for the first time (Table 1). The peak frequency of each of the 24 katydids species was found to range from as low as 12.6 kHz in Paragraecia temasek Tan & Ingrisch, 2014 to as high as 54.2 kHz in an unidentified Meconematini from Sandakan. Twenty-one species (87.5%) were found to have peak frequencies in the ultrasonic range, of which three species (12.5%) can be considered extreme ultrasonic callers (i.e., peak frequency >40 kHz; Table 1). The spectral entropy of the katydids ranges from 6.8 in Casigneta sp. 2 to 8.8 in Conocephalus cognatus (Redtenbacher, 1891). Of the 24 species whose calls are described here, we imaged and described the sound-producing structures of 18. Song and sound-producing structure descriptions Axylus philippinus (Hebard, 1922) (n = 1 male, 10 sound files) (Fig. 1): The calling song is a continuous trill made up of disyllabic echemes (each consisting of two amplitude peaks). At 30.040.5°C (28.9-30.3°C), the trill has a echeme repetition rate of 11+1 echeme s“! (9-11 echemes s~'). The echeme period is 92.9+5.5 ms (87.5-104.1 ms). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 34.741.3 kHz (32.5-36.0 kHz) and another peak at 16.4+1.9 kHz (13.5-19.0 kHz) showing energy in the sonic range; the spectral entropy is 8.5+0.1. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a straight stridulatory file of about 1.556 mm in length with 91 rather broad teeth. The teeth on the stridulatory file of the left tegmen are fairly uniformly distributed and narrowly spaced apart. The inter-tooth distance is nearly constant throughout the file. In the mid-part of the stridulatory file, the teeth density is 48.5 teeth mm™', and the average tooth width is 105 pm. The file (Cu2) is slightly elevated on a swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a rectangular mirror that is longer than broad and a stridulatory file of about 1.203 mm in length with about 59 rather broad teeth and a few indistinct teeth at the anal end. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 4, M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Table 1. Summary of the species recorded in this study. Species Country of origin Call structure Spectral entropy Peak freq. (kHz) Subf. Conocephalinae 1. = Axylus philippinus Philippines Continuous trill of disyllabic echeme 8.5+0.1 34.7413 2. Conocephalus cognatus Singapore Complex echeme 8.8+0.1 28.742.1 3. Conocephalus exemptus Singapore Complex echeme 7.8+0.1 15.5+0.2 4. Paragraecia temasek Singapore Echeme 7.740.1 12.6+0.1 5. Peracca macritchiensis Singapore Echeme sequence 7.4 29.341.1 6. | Salomona borneensis Malaysia Echeme sequence 8.4+0.1 13.9+0.4 7. Salomona maculifrons Philippines Sequence of isolated echemes 8.5+0.1 30.5+0.7 8. Viriacca insularis Malaysia Echeme 8.0+0.2 23.141.8 ws Viriacca modesta Brunei Echeme sequence 7.840.1 26.042.4 Subf. Lipotactinae 10. Lipotactes maculatus Singapore Isolated echemes 8.3 33.143.1 Subf. Meconematinae 11. Alloteratura lamella Singapore Complex echemes or isolated syllables 7.740.3 25.5+0.7 12. Borneopsis cryptosticta Singapore Sequence of paired syllables or echemes 8.540.3 42.342.4 13. Euanisous teuthroides Singapore Echeme 7440.2 30.3+0.7 14. Kuzicus denticulatus Singapore Continuous trill Tih 39.642.4 15. Meconematini (SDK.19.79) Malaysia Continuous trill of paired syllables 7.6 54.2+0.4 16. Neophisis siamensis Singapore Sequences of isolated syllables in| 36.741.8 17. Xiphidiopsis (Xiphidiopsis) dicera Singapore Continuous trill Let 40.9+0.4 Subf. Phaneropterinae 18. Casigneta sp. 1 Singapore Pulse train 7.640.1 28.7+0.8 19. Casigneta sp. 2 Singapore Triplet syllables 6.8+0.2 28.240.2 20. Holochlora nr. bilobata Singapore Isolated syllables 8.1+0.4 33.3+41.0 21. Phaneroptera brevis Singapore Paired syllables 79 21.9+0.8 22. Phaulula malayica Singapore Isolated syllables 7.8 23.641.2 23. Psyrana tigrina Malaysia Pulse train 8.1 352542) 1 24. Scambophyllum sanguinolentum Singapore Pulse train 7.0+0.1 23.7+0.3 Amplitude [Pa] Analysis of 20190629_031552 Original Signal Selected Signal c 0.5 Amplitude [Pa] o Echeme 1 -0.5 + 1. 4. 4 dd 2 4 6 8 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 Time [s] Time [ms] FE Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz -40 2 (50m = ee 5 3 ey haere fe 2 6 60 HY N\ \ 2 ¢ fr) \ 2 2 40 pe \ “ ue Peesl] \ Re coat ey ce | \ | sai 20 J fee 60 80 50 100 Time (ms) 150 200 Fig. 7. Salomona maculifrons male adult in the lab (A). Oscillograms showing a continuous trill (B) and a syllable (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the same syllable (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H), and ventral view of the right SF (I). the ends. The teeth are closely packed, and the distance between teeth is fairly similar. In the mid-part of the stridulatory file, the teeth density is 95 teeth mm’. The file (Cu2) is slightly elevated on a swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a somewhat tri- angular mirror with anterior margin rounded and posterior end acute, longer than broad. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 0.984 mm in length with about 100 rather broad teeth. Viriacca modesta Gorochov, 2013 (n = 2 males, 13 sound files) (Fig. 9): The calling song is a continuous echeme sequence made up of isolated echemes. Each echeme consists of 1-4 closely packed syllables. At 25.3+3.0°C (22.9-29.5°C), the echeme dura- tion is 0.1640.01 s (0.14—-0.19 s), the echeme period is 0.23+0.04 s (016-0.31 s), and the interval between consecutive echemes is 0.07+0.04 s (0.02-0.15). Syllable period is 29.345.2 ms (21.0- 38.0 ms). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 26.0+2.4 kHz (21.8-28.6 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 7.8+0.1. Ventrally, the left micropterous tegmen possesses a stridulatory file of about 1.451 mm in length with about 159 broad teeth. The file is very straight and faintly curving anteriorly at the basal end. The teeth are largest in the middle portion (average tooth width is 100 ppm), and tooth width tapers gently toward the ends. The teeth are closely packed, and the distance between teeth is fairly uniform. In the mid-part of the stridulatory file, the teeth density is 10.4 teeth mm. The file (Cu2) is slightly elevated on a swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a rectangular mirror longer than broad, with anterior margin broader and rounded and with posterior margin truncated and narrower. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 1.072 mm in length, with about 112 rather broad teeth. Lipotactes maculatus Hebard, 1922 (n = 1 male, 16 sound files) (Fig. 10): The calling song was first described from Bukit Timah (Singapore) by Ingrisch (1995) as a trill or as short echemes of 120-190 ms. We recorded another individual from Mandai (also Singapore) using an ultrasound-sensitive recorder to obtain more precise frequency data. The calling song from Mandai consists of an isolated echeme. The echeme duration is 0.1440.01 s (0.11-0.16 s), the echeme period is 2.48+0.55 s (1.74-3.51 S), and the interval between echemes is 2.34+0.54 s (1.59-3.35 s) at 28.541.1°C (26.9-29.3°C). Each echeme typi- cally consists of 4 (3-5) closely packed syllables. Syllable period is 23.2+1.8 ms (21.0-26.0 ms). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 33.143.1 kHz (25.9-38.2 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 8.3. Ventrally, the left micropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file of about 1.183 mm in length with about 43 stout teeth. The file is slightly curved. The teeth at the anal end are smallest (average tooth width is 13.4 zm) and closely packed (average in- ter-tooth distance is 16.6 am); the teeth in the middle of the file are largest (average tooth width is 38.3 zm) and are most widely spaced apart (average inter-tooth distance is 37.3 jum); the teeth at the basal end have an average tooth width of 20.7 pm and an average inter-tooth distance is 27.8 pm. The file (Cu2) is strongly elevated at the anal end and on a very swollen vein buttress (espe- cially swollen at the anal end). The right tegmen has a triangular mirror. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is slightly sinusoi- dal, about 1.176 mm in length, with about 33 stout teeth and a few indistinct teeth at both ends. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 10 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Analysis of 20180923_154344 Original Signal Selected Signal B a7 , ; E , C 0.6; 4 ' 0.4 & & 02 ® a g go é é < ge -0.4 4 1 1 4 o4 1 1 -0.6 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 ee 3600 3620 3640 3660 Time [s] Time [ms] D , Spectral Power; Peak=22.5kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz I, ea ‘A % Entropy=7 66 | \ Q 5.67 cal | N — x a > . o &, & SP are . ef Bo 8 “* e = = a @ a a eel ~~ _ “4 ¥ . . © * & & , ; é -0.5 : Wee eR I echeme ie wt ef 1 it 4 i's 1 n 4 n 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 6600 6800 7000 7200 7 Time [s] Time [ms] D x10% ae Power; Peak=30.4kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz r } | \ nin Entropy-7.08 \ Q.,-10.80 wT 7 I|| | som = 7} \ \ — 3 = £5 = a. \ 5 3 . | a o | | \ [\ IN y we 7 ew x F aes Ved ~~ 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 200 400 600 800 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) Pn, nga —— 200.0000Um. Fig. 13. Euanisous teuthroides male adult in the lab (A). Oscillograms showing seven echemes of varying duration (B) and a single echeme (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the same echeme (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H), and ventral view of the right SF (I). Analysis of 20190926_233323 B 1 —— Signal . c Selected Signal | f | {i 4 | , _ 0.57 a i) oO a, o, oO oO Zo : a a £ E < < -0.5) - | 1 i hil -1 a. 1 ty 1 } 1 1 A Ly 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 Time [s] Time [ms] D «10% Naga Power; Peak=40.9kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz i ll \ Entropy=7.60 | i) O.,8.91 | N \ ony Rake . | wz 4 | =e & | 4 \ oe ~ 6 2 VA a ¢ Ww \ . \ ra A \ | oe DRS EE eect ne yea athe 20 40 60 80 100 = 120 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) Fig. 14. Kuzicus denticulatus male adult in its natural environment in Singapore (A). Oscillograms showing a continuous trill (B) and closer view of the continuous trill (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the closer view of the continuous trill (E). Meconematini (Sandakan) (n = 1 male, 6 sound files) (Fig. 15): The calling song consists of a continuous trill made up of syllables occurring in pairs. At 29.3°C, each doublet has a du- 82.7+11.6 ms (63.0-114.0 ms). The first syllable has a duration of 7.3+0.6 ms (7.0-9.0 ms), and the second syllable has a dura- tion of 8.0+0.7 ms (7.0-10.0 ms). The call spectrum has a peak ration of 33.6+3.6 ms (30.0-41.0 ms), period of 116.3+11.7 ms (95.0-146.0 ms) and an interval between consecutive doublets of JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA frequency of 54.2+0.4 kHz (53.5-54.6 kHz), and the spectral en- tropy is 7.6. RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 14 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Analysis of 20191005_025443 Bos __ Original Signal Cc sins afl hil | \ ) } Amplitude [Pa] Amplitude [Pa] 5 10 15 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Frequency [kHz] Selected Signal _ nm int io -0,2 | __ Selected Signal 0.47 0.2 | 0 -0.4 & ; ; ; ; . ‘ 9300 9400 9500 9600 9700 9800 9900 Time [s] Time [ms] D «10% Spectral Power; Peak=54,6kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz A 120 af | | il se 40 too el || =e a o | Hl | 50 c=) = - = | I 5 2 oOo, ry | 60 e4t f\ || | Peo \ coe &F | } |) \ 2 40 2} 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Time (ms) o io Amplitude [Pa] o -0.4 | 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 Time [ms] Fig. 15. Meconematini (Sandakan) male adult in its natural environment in Sandakan, Malaysia (A). Oscillograms showing a continuous trill (B) and a section of the trill with six complete doublets of syllables (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the same six com- plete doublets of syllables (E). Oscillogram showing a doublet of syllables, with the syllables denoted as S1 and S2, in greater details (F). Neophisis siamensis Jin, 1992 (n = 3 males, 10 sound files) (Fig. 16): The calling song consists of a sequence of isolated syllables. Each syllable shows two amplitude peaks. At 29.340.5°C (28.5- 30.4°C), syllable duration is 100.6+17.4 ms (57.0-123.0 ms). The interval between syllables is highly variable, ranging from 42.0 to 270.0 ms (107.4+63.6 ms). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 36.741.8 kHz (32.0-38.2 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 7.1. Xiphidiopsis (Xiphidiopsis) dicera Hebard, 1922 (n = 1 male, 7 sound files) (Fig. 17): The calling song consists of continuous trill made up of isolated syllables of varying amplitudes. Each syllable is made up of two pulses, with the first pulse typically of lower amplitude than the second pulse. At 29.140.2°C (29.0-29.6°C), syllable duration is 56.8+6.3 ms (46.0-70.0 ms) and period is 75.4+17.1 ms (57.0-116.0 ms). The interval between doublets is highly variable, ranging from 3.0 to 62.0 ms (18.6+15.8 ms). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 40.9+0.4 kHz (40.4-41.4 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 7.7. Casigneta sp. 1 (n = 2 males, 15 sound files) (Fig. 18): The call- ing song consists of a pulse-train isolated in time. The train may correspond to a long syllable rather than an echeme owing to the presence of frequency modulation. At 29.64+0.6°C (29.0-30.4°C), each pulse train has a duration of 0.36+0.04 s (0.27-0.44 s) and is made up of 24+3 (16-27) pulses of gradually increasing amplitude over time. The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 28.7+0.8 kHz (27.2-30.0 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 7.6+0.1. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file of about 1.338 mm in length with about 110 rather broad teeth. The file is substraight, slightly curved at the basal end. The teeth are largest in the middle portion (average tooth width is JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA 125 pm), and tooth width tapers gently toward the ends. The teeth are most densely packed in the anal end (teeth density is 107 teeth mm~-') then in the middle region of the file (teeth density is 71 teeth mm’), and least densely packed at the basal end (teeth den- sity is 51 teeth mm’). The file (Cu2) is barely elevated on a swol- len vein buttress. The right tegmen has a trapezoidal mirror. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 1.323 mm in length with relatively stout teeth. Casigneta sp. 2 (n = 1 male, 19 sound files) (Fig. 19): The call- ing song appears to consist of isolated syllables, each containing three pulses. At 29.8+0.5°C (28.7-30.1°C), each triple of pulses has a duration of 0.15+0.01 s (0.13-0.16 s). The first pulse dura- tion is 12.5+3.5 ms (10.0-25.0 ms), the second pulse duration is 12.1+2.2 ms (10.0-18.0 ms), and the third pulse duration is 12.4+2.6 ms (10.0-19.0 ms). The first pulse is more temporally separated from the second and third pulses. The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 28.2+0.2 kHz (27.8-28.8 kHz), and the spec- tral entropy is 6.8+0.2. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file of about 1.314 mm in length with about 75 rather broad teeth. The file is substraight, slightly curved at the basal end. The teeth are largest in the middle portion (average tooth width is 95 pm), and tooth width tapers gently toward the ends. The teeth are closely packed, and the distance between teeth is fairly uni- form. In the mid-part of the stridulatory file, the teeth density is 56 teeth mm!. The file (Cu2) is barely elevated on a swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has an elongated rectangular mirror, distinctly longer than broad. The stridulatory file on the right teg- men is about 0.913 mm in length, with about 52 teeth. RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A-Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Original Signal 1 - 3 — B I, |) G | I _ 05 _ 0.5} s] oO a, B, i) oO Soo a 4 4 ces a —E E 4 < -0.5 | -0.5} iI 4 _— i Ful 5 10 15 Time [s] D «10° Spectral Power; Peak=35.9kHz E f 120 ' o,.05s 100 H N 5 @ = 20 8 | |\\ 23 506 ¢ al A ] y 2 § 60 By a $ [ iz 40 | oe Te, 20 byte en a f ie) 20 40 60 80 100 120 Frequency [kHz] F Selected Signal e a Amplitude [Pa] oe a Analysis of 20190923 013228 i=] 1.245, 1.25 1.255 Time [ms] 1.26 «104 Selected Signal T _i_ 3500 mn 1500 1 1 2500 3000 Time [ms] 2000 4000 Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz 0.5 Le Time (s) 2.5 15 Fig. 16. Neophisis siamensis male adult in its natural environment in Singapore (A). Oscillograms showing a sequence of syllables (B) and a section of the sequence with 17 syllables (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the 17 syllables (E). Oscillogram showing a single syllable with two amplitude peaks denoted as P1 and P2 (F). Analysis of 20190102_224756 B 1 Original Signal — 0.5 oo a, oD 3 o == a € << -0.5+ -{ >. = ———o =i — 1 2 3 4 5 Time [s] D «103 Spectral Power; Peak=40.9kHz ih 4+ Il i Entropy=7.41 | Q 921.54 | | g a2 | py ih ie) 20 40 60 80 100 120 Frequency [kHz] F Selected Signal Syllable 0.2 ws a 0.1 i] 30 3 04 -0.2 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Time [ms] Selected Signal C 0.6! : 7 : ] | | 0.4} | & 02 8 3 9 a & -0.2 a | -0.4 0.65) bi a ss me 4 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time [ms] E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz 40 o x ‘as _ oO 7 fe) oot 8 ra 0.2 0.4 0.6 Time (s) 0.8 Fig. 17. Xiphidiopsis (Xiphidiopsis) dicera male adult in its natural environment in Singapore (A). Oscillograms showing a sequence of syllables (B) and a section of the trill with 16 syllables (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the 16 syllables (E). Oscillogram showing three syllables, each with two pulses, in greater detail (F). JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Analysis of 20190910_034100 B at ; Original Signal - : CG ; - Selected Signal 0.5 Amplitude [Pa] Amplitude [Pa] o 0.5 | 1 2 3 4 5 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time [s] Time [ms] D x104 ‘oes Power; Peak=29.0kHz = Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz 15 {t\ } in| Entropy=7.81 | | Q-1143 +-40 | 3 10} 4 |} Power > &. Power [dB] Frequency (kHz) eee | | PN lA pa j 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) Fig. 18. Casigneta sp. 1 male adult in its natural environment in Singapore (A). Oscillograms showing a pulse train (B) and a closer view of the pulse train (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the same pulse train (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H), and ventral view of the right SF (1). Analysis of 20200704_005608 Original Signal Selected Signal A?) _—. : ; i : : : B 04r : 7 : a : Amplitude [Pa] ° Amplitude [Pa] o -0.2 | ; : ‘ -0.4 | : } -0.5 7 = 2 id @ 89 Wo 42 14 We 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 Time [s] Time [ms] C «10% Spectral Power; Peak=28.5kHz D Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz a) ill -40 at i rae L. I 3 > j | \ ox g I {I joo @ S2 } fl \ 6 ¢€ i ae | tae 2 9 | \ a! \ a A \ A a o } \ A A i= 1 } | \ Pal \ i \ = | Ce Bi 5 J 1 i 4-80 f* \ \ fl VJ \ l\ i @: \ Vv J NA of ; | ) 20 40 60 80 100 120 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) Fig. 19. Casigneta sp. 2. Oscillograms showing two triplets of pulses (A) and a triplet of pulses denoted as P1 to P3 (B). Power spectrum (C) and spectrogram of the same triplet of pulses (D). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (E), ventral view of the same SF (F), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (G), and ventral view of the right SF (H). Holochlora nr. bilobata (Karny, 1926) (n = 2 males, 15 sound (29.5-45.3 ms). The interval between syllables varies at 4.0+1.7 s files) (Fig. 20): The calling song consists of an isolated syllable. (2.3-8.6s). The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 33.341.0 kHz At 29.8+0.4°C (28.4-30.4°C), syllable duration is 37.24+3.5 ms _ (31.5-34.9 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 8.1+0.4. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. 17 Analysis of 20200707_151426 B 05; ___ Original Signal : _ Selected Signal 0.3} fe _ 02} [5] [} o, & o1} ® oO E Zo = £-0.1} < < -0.2} 0.3} 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1.23 1.235 1.24 1.245 Time [s] Time [ms] «104 D «10% Spectral Power; Peak=32.8kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz rs ¥ j 40 120 25 i ver ie A 4100 all @ = 80 5 nt |(\ j-02 > S nt Ii F § 60 a. / 5 5 / | Oa 8 40 Fi \\ ‘ is / ra | f\ \/ \ at sail n / 4 \ A\e7 Ee Sat _ N ? ae ; Pi Las 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 50 100 150 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) — 200.0000um Fig. 20. Holochlora nx. bilobata male adult in the lab (A). Oscillograms showing six isolated syllables (B) and a closer view of a syllable (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the same syllable (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H), and ventral view of the right SF (I). Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stout strid- ulatory file of about 1.126 mm in length with about 47 broad teeth. The file is straight. The teeth are largest in the middle por- tion (average tooth width is 95 ym) and distinctly smaller at the ends (average tooth width is 38 pm). The distance between teeth is fairly uniform in the mid-part of the file (teeth density is 44 teeth mm~-'), only slightly larger at the ends. The file (Cu2) is elevated in the middle on a very swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a small rectangular mirror, somewhat obsolete. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 0.633 mm in length with about 32 indistinct teeth. Phaneroptera brevis Serville, 1838 (n = 1 male, 11 sound files) (Fig. 21): The calling song consists of a pair of syllables. At 29.9+0.2°C (29.6-30.2°C), each pair of syllables has dura- tion of 0.33+0.01 s (0.31-0.35 s). The first syllable has a dis- tinctly lower amplitude and shorter duration of 36.3+8.8 ms (22.0-50.0 ms) than the second syllable (duration is 53.8+10.9 ms [30.0-70.0 ms]). The interval between the two syllables is 0.24+0.02 s (0.21-0.27 s). The call spectrum has a peak fre- quency of 21.9+0.8 kHz (20.3-22.8 kHz), and the spectral en- tropy is 7.9. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file, somewhat split into two parts connected by a perpendic- ular ‘bridge’. The entire stridulatory file on the left tegmen is about 1.753 mm in length. The anal part is short and straight, about 0.335 mm in length with about 24 smaller and stout (of uniform size and spacing) teeth. The average tooth width is 34 pm, and the teeth density is 65 teeth mm~'. The main file is straight, about 1.263 mm in length with about 36 larger teeth. The teeth are larg- est in the middle portion (average tooth width is 86 jm) and dis- tinctly smaller at the basal end (average tooth width is 52 pm). The teeth are less densely packed in the middle portion (teeth den- sity is 18 teeth mm~') compared to the basal end (teeth density is 49 teeth mm’). The file (Cu2) is faintly elevated in the middle on a slightly swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a large oblong mirror, distinctly longer than broad. Phaulula malayica (Karny, 1926) (n = 1 male, 6 sound files) (Fig. 22): The calling song consists of isolated syllables appearing as rapid-decay pulses. At 29.340.4°C (29.1-30.1°C), syllable duration is 53.4+7.5 ms (41.0-65.0 ms). The interval between syllables varies at 1.640.4 s (1.2-2.7 s). The call spec- trum has two peaks in energy, typically with a peak frequency of 23.641.2 kHz (22.5-25.2 kHz). In some instances, however, a second peak in the spectrum of 33.5-33.8 kHz can be the dominant frequency. The spectral entropy is 7.8. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file of about 1.364 mm in length with about 45 broad teeth. The file is straight. The teeth are largest in the middle portion (average tooth width is 112 pm), and tooth width tapers towards the ends. The teeth are uniformly packed in the mid-part of the stridulatory file (teeth density is 23 teeth mmz@'), less densely packed at the anal end (teeth density is 31 teeth mm-'), and more densely packed at the basal end (teeth density is 50 teeth mm~'). The stridulatory file (Cu2) is faintly elevated in the middle on a swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a large mirror, longer than broad. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Analysis of 20200609_120247 Original Signal Selected Signal Bt aia ae C 28; “a es A pair of 0.4} Syllables 0.5} = syllables = E : E 02 oa oO Uv no) 2 = é | e & & -0.2) -0.5} -0.4 | -1! 1 1 A - je J -0.6 1 2 ml 1. ri | 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 Time [s] Time [ms] «104 D , Spectral Power; Peak=21.9kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz i 120 | ane _100 | | | -60m X 80 \ 2 > | | & 2 60 ) | =z 3 feud | a g | | ms Ne AS = 40 | \ fh oa a a -80 | a al fH we MO NG 20 | iy Wi y f uy ri i" uf 0 ) 20 40 60 80 100 8120 100 200 300 400 500 600 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) Fig. 21. Phaneroptera brevis male adult in its natural environment in Singapore (A). Oscillograms showing two complete pairs of syllables (B) and a closer view of a pair of syllables (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the pair of syllables (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), and ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H). px se eS Analysis of 20200726_070639 Original Signal 08 ce Selected Signal Amplitude [Pa] o Amplitude [Pa] -0.5| 5 10045 20 1.215 4.22 4.225 1.23 Time [s] Time [ms] «104 D , Spectral Power; Peak=22,9kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz | ‘ Entropy-7.70 2 46.00 sats N = iG | a <= I a > - o | | - & | fd 3 | a § of | hn c i \ \ [Pgh ot \ { Nee, Oe / \/ fo 10] 20 40 60 80 100 120 50 100 150 Frequency [kHz] Time (ms) tia? @, 200,.0000um =F Fig. 22. Phaulula malayica male adult in the lab (A). Oscillograms showing five isolated syllables (B) and a closer view of a syllable (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the syllable (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), and ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H). JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Psyrana tigrina (Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878) (n = 1 male, 14 sound files) (Fig. 23): The calling song consists of pulse train iso- lated in time. At 30.2+0.1°C (30.0-30.4°C), each pulse train has duration of 0.26+0.01 s (0.24-0.28 s) and is made up of numer- ous pulses of varying amplitudes and duration. The pulses stead- ily increase in amplitude to a maximum in the initial 0.17+0.01 s (0.16-0.19 s) of the pulse train before decreasing rather abruptly in amplitude in the final 0.09+0.01 s (0.06-0.12 s) of the pulse train. The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 35.5+2.1 kHz (31.8-38.0 kHz), and the spectral entropy is 8.1. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridulatory file of about 2.236 mm in length with about 83 broad teeth. The file is straight. The teeth are largest in the middle portion (average tooth width is 244 pm), and tooth width tapers at the ends. The teeth are narrowly and uniformly packed in the mid-part of the stridula- tory file (teeth density is 34 teeth mm’). The file (Cu2) is faintly elevated in the middle on a slightly swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has an elongated rectangular mirror. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 1.851 mm in length with about 38 teeth at the anal half and numerous indistinct teeth at the basal half. Scambophyllum sanguinolentum (Westwood, 1848) (n = 1 male, 8 sound files) (Fig. 24): The calling song consists of a pulse train isolated in time and very likely a long syllable produced dur- ing a single but slow closing wing stroke. Similar syllable patterns have been observed in the genus Isophya, e.g., Isophya costata (Hel- ler, 1988). The syllable, here recognized as pulse trains, can occur in isolation or in doublets or triplets. At 29.740.0°C (29.7-29.8°C), es Amplitude [Pa] 0.5} -0.5} 19 train duration is 0.32+40.01 s (0.30-0.35 s). When occurring in doublets or triplets, train period is 0.9740.18 s (0.78-1.38 s) and intervals between trains are 0.64+0.18 s (0.43-1.04 s). Each train is made up of 43+2 (39-47) pulses, with pulses increasing in am- plitude at the start and remaining relatively consistent. The call spectrum has a peak frequency of 23.7+0.3 kHz (23.2-24.1 kHz), and spectral entropy is 7.0+0.1. Ventrally, the left macropterous tegmen possesses a stridula- tory file of about 1.509 mm in length with about 53 broad teeth. The file is straight and strongly bent at the basal third. The average tooth width in the middle region is 46 pm. Tooth width tapers at the ends. The file (Cu2) is slightly elevated in the middle on a very swollen vein buttress. The right tegmen has a squarish mirror. The stridulatory file on the right tegmen is about 1.208 mm in length with numerous indistinct teeth. Discussion Calling songs.—Based on the 24 katydid species recorded in this study (Table 1), we observed that the calling songs of Southeast Asian katydid species are highly diversified in terms of both time and frequency. While some species produce transient calling songs, such as relatively simple and isolated pulses in Holochlora, species of Conocephalus produce complex echemes with two distinct structures within each echeme. Other species produce continuous trills (e.g., in Axylus and Kuzicus) and a short sequence of trains (e.g., in Euanisous and Psyrana). Some species, such as Alloteratura Analysis of 20191010_030403 Original Signal — Cc a ; Selected Signal + + | + + : Syllable | | Al WHIN i | ] f I] = 95} ii | o | | f oa, Aw 7 ( 80 = E | < | } 1 -0.5 | | Wil an 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3700 3750 3800 3850 3900 3950 4000 Time [s] Time [ms] x103 «gi Power; Peak=33.6kHz E Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz fas in 1 rt 1 n — wo oO oOo & - oO Power [dB] Frequency (kHz) 60 80 Frequency [kHz] 40 100 150 200 Time (ms) Fig. 23. Psyrana tigrina male adult in its natural environment in Sandakan, Malaysia (A). Oscillograms showing an isolated pulse train (B) and a closer view of the pulse-train (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of the pulse train (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H), and ventral view of the right SF (I). JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 20 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Analysis of 20200814_004805 Original Signal_ Echeme = » _____ Selected Signal _ — C os | 0.4 | | Se io = ty Amplitude [Pa] ° i Syllable 5 10 15 20 Time [s] 1.11 1.12 Time [ms] =) ro) : 1.13 «104 «103 Spectral Power; Peak=23.2kHz Spectrogram; fs=256kHz, nfft=2048, Af=125.0Hz Ertropy-6.89 Q.,~6.57 Power [dB] 0 20 40 60 80 Frequency [kHz] 200 300 Time (ms) Fig. 24. Scambophyllum sanguinolentum male adult in the lab (A). Oscillograms showing two echemes (first one with three syllables and second one with two syllables) followed by an isolated syllable (B) and a single syllable (C). Power spectrum (D) and spectrogram of a syllable (E). Three-dimensional anal view of the left stridulatory file (SF) (F), ventral view of the same SF (G), ventral view of the right tegmen sound-producing organs (H) and ventral view of the right SF (1). lamella and Borneopsis cryptosticta, also had two modes of calling song recorded in the laboratory. The Conocephalus exemptus represents a curious case in which the calling songs from Thailand and Singapore differ drastically. Given that the taxonomy of Conocephalus is complicated, it could be that the individuals from Thailand and Singapore represent two different cryptic species or that this widely distributed species exhibits population differences in calling songs. Combining the bioacoustic data and further examining the morphology of the ‘species’ from different areas of its distribution can shed light on its bioacoustics and taxonomy. The call analysis also provides input on the quality of the sig- nal, and we used the quality factor Q (Q,,,) to investigate this variable. Although Q assumes that the spectrum is symmetrical (Bennet-Clark 1999), spectral symmetry is rarely the case in the calls of most katydids, especially for broadband singers. For this reason, we present an alternative means of measuring the tenden- cy of a signal to be a random noise rather than the actual signal from the source (i.e., the katydid call). Entropy has been used by various authors to measure this tendency from various perspec- tives. For example, Sueur et al. (2012) used a normalized form for the calculated value that tends toward 0 for a single pure tone, increases with the number of frequency bands and amplitude modulations, and tends toward 1 for random noise. Chivers et al. (2017a) report entropy values of ~5-9 in neotropical katydids (without normalization). Using the same protocols proposed by Chivers et al. (2017a), here we report entropy values of 6.8-8.8, which suggests that Chivers et al. (2017a) included species with high tonality (common in many neotropical Pseudophyllinae). The peak frequency of the 24 Southeast Asian katydids ranges from 12.6 to 54.2 kHz, with more than 80% of species having energy peaks in the ultrasonic range (18 species having a peak frequency between 20 and 40 kHz, and 3 species having a peak frequency > 40 kHz) (Fig. 25). This is congruent with what was previously documented: most katydids produce ultra- sonic sounds (Montealegre-Z 2009, Montealegre-Z et al. 2017). The three extreme ultrasonic callers (peak frequency >40 kHz) reported here are species from the subfamily Meconematinae. We can expect to find more species of katydid from the region to produce extreme ultrasound as they are collected. These may include species of Glenophisis Karny, 1926 from the subfamily Hexacentrinae, a small genus of katydids found in Southeast Asia (Tan 2012). These katydids share superficial morphological resemblance with neotropical Arachnoscelis Karny, 1911 species and Supersonus Sarria-S et al., 2014 species (both from the sub- family Meconematinae), which can produce calls with frequency peaking at 70 kHz and above 125 kHz, respectively (Chivers et al. 2014, Sarria-S et al. 2014). Unfortunately, we have yet to en- counter these rare katydids for such a study. Likewise, some Pseu- JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Number of species 10 20 30 40 50 Peak frequency (KHz) Fig. 25. A histogram showing the number of katydid species and the peak frequency of their calling songs. The red bars represent sonic callers (<20 kHz), light blue bars represent ultrasonic callers, and the dark blue bars represent extreme ultrasonic callers (>40 kHz). dophyllinae from Southeast Asia can produce exceedingly low frequencies (e.g., 0.6 kHz in Tympanophyllum arcufolium) (Heller 1995), and it would not be surprising to find more species that produce such low frequencies. In this study, all six species of Meconematini were found to produce songs with an entirely ultrasonic spectrum. This is congruent with previous reports of calls of Meconematini from Africa, such as those of Amytta Karsch, 1888 species (Hemp and Heller 2017, Hemp 2021). Among the species studied here are also the only group of katydids that produce extreme ultrasound, specifically Borneopsis cryptosticta, Xiphidiopsis (Xiphidiopsis) dicera and an unidentified Meconematini from Sandakan (although Tan et al. 2019b also reported extreme- ultrasonic singers among Phlugidini from Southeast Asia). Being highly speciose in Southeast Asia—with at least 104 genera currently known (Cigliano et al. 2022)—this group may hold the key to understanding the evolution of extreme ultrasound production in katydids. However, elucidating the phylogeny of Meconematini is crucial, as the relationships between and among many currently known genera and species are still unknown, and many groups are proabably paraphyletic. The ability to produce calls with entirely ultrasonic spectrum and extreme ultrasound are likely to have evolved multiple times and dependent on other factors instead of merely phylogenetic relatedness. Second, these predatory katydids usually occur in low abundance, and most species were described without having their calls recorded (but see Tan et al. 2020b). With continued effort to document the bioacoustics of these katydids, we can expect to find more species of extreme-ultrasonic singers from more genera, as well as more variations in their call structure and peak frequencies among different clades. We refrain from classifying each species as either noctur- nal or diurnal, even if some species’ activity appears rather dis- tinct. For example, the transient calling songs of Holochlora and Psyrana corroborate field observations suggesting they are most active at night. As the katydids were not always recorded over the entire circadian cycle, and many species only have a few re- cordings from one or two individuals, we could not model the calling activity found in Tan and Robillard (2021). In that study, the authors recorded eneopterine crickets under standardized 21 conditions, modeled their calling activity over 24 hours, and consequently found that many species exhibit complex circadian rhythms in their calling activity (i.e., multiple peaks in calling activity in both the day and night). Sporadic recordings may give an over-simplified impression about whether a species is strictly nocturnal or diurnal. Sound-producing organs.—The properties of stridulatory file (length, number of teeth, and teeth density or spacing) and mir- ror (e.g., stiffness, membrane structure) are important in deter- mining the frequency and resonance of a calling song (Morris and Pipher 1967, Bailey 1970, Montealegre-Z 2009, Montealegre-Z and Postles 2010, Montealegre-Z et al. 2017). Corroborating with previous studies on neotropical katydids (e.g., Montealegre-Z and Morris 1999), we observed vast diversity in the morphology of the Southeast Asian katydids. While the left tegmina of most of the reported species have straight/faintly curved stridulatory files with broad teeth (often closely packed together), a few species ex- hibit peculiarity. Euanisous teuthroides have squarish teeth on the stridulatory file, with an indentation in the middle of each tooth. Phaneroptera brevis have two parts to their stridulatory file, with a shorter anal half (with smaller teeth) and longer basal half (with larger teeth), as is typical for the genus Phaneroptera (Heller et al. 2017, 2021b). This may contribute to the different call parameters in various parts of the calling songs that have been observed in Sphagniana sphagnorum (Walker, 1869) and an eneopterine cricket Eneoptera guyanensis Chopard, 1931 (see Morris and Pipher 1972, Robillard et al. 2015). It has been well established that the mirror area correlates neg- atively with peak frequency of the calling songs in katydids (Mor- ris et al. 1994, Montealegre-Z 2009, Montealegre-Z et al. 2017). We also found species with mirrors of different sizes relative to tegmina size and shape. Some Phaneropterinae, i.e., Holochlora nt. bilobata and Scambophyllum sanguinolentum, have rather obsolete mirrors. A typical mirror consists of the CuPaf (and sometimes CuPaa2) and frame surrounding a clear membrane (Chivers et al. 2017b). In Holochlora nr. bilobata, the mirror membrane is rela- tively small, whereas in Scambophyllum sanguinolentum, the mirror membrane is made up of an interlaced network of veins. Bioacoustics and integrative taxonomy.—New acoustic data allow us to re-test species hypotheses previously delimited using only morphology. For example, we are able to integrate bioacoustics with traditional taxonomy for the genus Viriacca by comparing the calling songs for three of the four known species—Viriacca insularis from the Malay Peninsula, Viriacca modesta from Borneo, and previously described calls of Viriacca viridis Ingrisch, 1998, also from the Malay Peninsula (Ingrisch 1998). Although their sound-producing organs share many similarities, the three species exhibit distinct call structures, frequencies, syllable durations, and intervals between syllables. These differences are congruent with the genitalia differences used to diagnose these congeners (Gorochov 2013). This example also highlights that taxonomy is hypothesis-driven, in which species can be re-evaluated with new and different datasets. In light of this, we also recommend using bioacoustics to validate morphologically similar congeners in other Southeast Asian katydids. These can include the Peracca subulicerca species complex consisting of Peracca subulicerca (Karny, 1926) from Java, and Peracca tiomani Gorochov, 2011 and Peracca macritchiensis from Malay Peninsula, in which the species characters remain debatable. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 22 Conclusions We want to emphasize the preliminary nature of this study, as it is limited by too few species and very few specimens. Neverthe- less, by amassing data on the calling songs in understudied katy- dids from Southeast Asia, this study provides a baseline for build- ing a sound database for Southeast Asian orthopterans. Despite their importance in species recognition, calling songs are not al- ways recorded in taxonomic descriptions. The morphology of the sound-producing organs of katydids (e.g., stridulatory file length, number of teeth, and mirror area) is sometimes overlooked in traditional taxonomy. Incorporating calling songs and/or sound- producing organs into traditional taxonomy can help address the taxonomy impediment while advancing our knowledge about the bioacoustics of Southeast Asian katydids. Acknowledgements The project by MKT in Singapore was funded by the Wildlife Re- serves Singapore Conservation Fund (WRSCF). Fieldwork and taxo- nomic collection by MKT in the Philippines, Sandakan, and Brunei Darussalam were granted by the Orthoptera Species File Grant 2018 and 2019 and the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund (The Linnean Soci- ety of London) 2019, respectively. The EchoMeter Touch Pro 2 was provided by the Wildlife Acoustics Scientific Product Grant 2019. FMZ was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), grant DEB-1937815. The authors are thankful to Huiqing Yeo (in Singapore, Pulau Tioman, and Brunei Darussalam), Siew Tin Toh (in Pulau Tioman and Sandakan), Momin Binti, John Lee Yukang, and Saudi Bintang (in Sandakan) for field assistance; to Xing-bao Jin, Sigfrid Ingrisch and Andrei Gorochov for help with species identification; and to the UP Laguna Land Grant manage- ment for security and accommodation during fieldwork (in Laguna, the Philippines). Permissions for collecting material were granted by the Forestry Department, Ministry of Primary Resources and Tourism, Brunei Darussalam (JPH/PDK/01 Pt 2); the Sabah Bio- diversity Centre (JKM/MBS.1000-2/3 JLD.3 (99)) (for Sandakan)); the National Parks Board (NP/RP18-064), Singapore; and the Re- search Promotion and Co-Ordination Committee, Economic Plan- ning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department (UPE: 40/200/19/3395), Malaysia (for Pulau Tioman). The authors thank the Orthopterists’ Society and the Journal of Orthoptera Research for their support in publishing this article. References Bailey WJ (1967) Further investigations into function of mirror in Tettigonioidea (Orthoptera). Nature 215: 762-763. https://doi. org/10.1038/215762a0 Bailey WJ (1970) The mechanics of stridulation in bush crickets (Tettigo- nioidea, Orthoptera) I. Tegminal Generator. Journal of Experimental Biology 52: 495-505. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.52.3.495 Bailey WJ, Gwynne DT (1988) Mating system, mate choice and ultrasonic calling in a zaprochiline katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behavior 105: 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853988X00025 Baker E, Chesmore D (2020) Standardization of bioacoustic terminology for insects. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e54222. https://doi. org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54222 Belwood JJ, Morris GK (1987) Bat predation and its influence on calling behaviour in neotropical katydids. Science 238: 64-67. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.238.4823.64 Bennet-Clark HC (1999) Resonators in insect sound production: how in- sects produce loud pure-tone songs. Journal of Experimental Biology 202: 3347-3357. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202.23.3347 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Bennet-Clark HC (2003) Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Journal of Experimental Biology 206: 1479- 1496. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00281 Chamorro-Rengifo J, Braun H (2016) Phlugis ocraceovittata and its ultra- sonic calling song (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Phlugidini). Zootaxa 4107: 439-443. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4107.3.12 Chamorro-Rengifo J, Braun H, Lopes-Andrade C (2014) The secret stridula- tory file under the right tegmen in katydids (Orthoptera, Ensifera, Tet- tigonioidea). Zootaxa 3821(5): 590-596. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.3821.5.7 Chamorro-Rengifo J, Olivier RDS (2017) A new genus of Phlugidini (Orthop- tera: Tettigoniidae: Meconematinae) with asymmetrical mandibles. Zootaxa 4286: 391-400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4286.3.6 Chivers BD, Jonsson T, Soulsbury CD, Montealegre-Z F (2017a) Structural biomechanics determine spectral purity of bush-cricket calls. Biology Letters 13: 20170573. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0573 Chivers BD, Béthoux O, Sarria-S FA, Jonsson T, Mason AC, Montealegre-Z F (2017b) Functional morphology of tegmina-based stridulation in the relict species Cyphoderris monstrosa (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Prophalangopsidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 220: 1112- 1121. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.153106 Chivers BD, Jonsson T, Cadena-Castaneda OJ, Montealegre-Z F (2014) Ultrasonic reverse stridulation in the spider-like katydid Arachnoscelis (Orthoptera: Listrosceledinae). Bioacoustics 23: 67-77. https://doi.or g/10.1080/09524622.2013.816639 Cigliano MM, Braun H, Eades DC, Otte D (2022) Orthoptera Species File Online. Version 5 (5.0). http://orthoptera.speciesfile.org/HomePage/ Orthoptera/HomePage.aspx [accessed 27 February 2022] Ewing AW (1989) Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behavior. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Gorochov AV (1998) New and little known Meconematinae of the tribes Meconematini and Phlugidini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Zoosys- tematica Rossica 7: 101-131. Gorochov AV (2008) New and little known katydids of the tribe Mecone- matini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Meconematinae) from south-east Asia. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 312: 26-42. Gorochov AV (2011) Taxonomy of the katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from East Asia and adjacent islands. Communication 2. Far East Ento- mologist 227: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.379.1 Gorochov AV (2013) Taxonomy of the katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from East Asia and adjacent islands. Communication 6. Far Eastern Entomologist 259: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.379.1 Gorochov AV (2021) Taxonomy of the katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigonii- dae) from East Asia and adjacent islands. Communication 14. Far Eastern Entomologist 434: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.434.1 Heller KG (1988) Bioakustik der europaischen Laubheuschrecken. - Okol- ogie in Forschung und Anwendung 1, 358 pp. Heller KG (1995) Acoustic signaling in palaeotropical bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea: Pseudophyllidae): Does predation pressure by eavesdropping enemies differ in the Palaeo- and Neotropics? Journal of Zoology 237: 469-485. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02775.x Heller KG, Hemp C (2020) Hyperdiverse songs, duetting, and the roles of intra- and intersexual selection in the acoustic communication of the genus Eurycorypha (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteri- nae). Organisms Diversity and Evolution 20: 597-617. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13127-020-00452-1 Heller KG, Baker E, Ingrisch S, Korsunovskaya O, Liu CX, Riede K, Warchalowska-Sliwa E (2021a) Bioacoustics and systematics of Mecopoda (and related forms) from South East Asia and adjacent areas (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, Mecopodinae) including some chromosome data. Zootaxa 5005: 101-144. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.5005.2.1 Heller KG, Heller M, Volleth M, Samietz J, Hemp C (2021b) Similar songs, but different mate localization strategies of the three species of Phaneroptera occurring in Western Europe (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). European Journal of Entomology 118: 111-122. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2021.012. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Heller KG, Ingrisch S, Liu CX, Shi FM, Hemp C, Warchatowska-Sliwa E, Rentz DCF (2017) Complex songs and cryptic ethospecies: the case of the Ducetia japonica group (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea: Phanerop- teridae: Phaneropterinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 286-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlw019 Hemp C (2021) A Field Guide to the Bushcrickets, Wetas and Raspy Crickets of Tanzania and Kenya; with contributions from Andreas Hemp and Klaus- Gerhard Heller. Senckenberg Gesellschaft fiir Naturforschung, 451 pp. Hemp C, Heller KG (2017) Revision of the genus Amytta (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Meconematinae) and new species from East Africa. Zootaxa 4263: 295-317. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4263.2.5 Ingrisch S (1995) Revision of the Lipotactinae, a new subfamily of Tetti- gonioidea (Ensifera). Insect Systematics and Evolution 26: 273-320. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631295X00026 Ingrisch S (1998) Monograph of the Oriental Agraeciini (Insecta: Ensifera: Tettigoniidae): Taxonomic revision, phylogeny, stridulation, and de- velopment. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 206: 1-391. [Figs 1-123, Maps 1-3.] Ingrisch S (2015) A revision of the Axylus group of Agraeciini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae) and of some other species formerly included in Nicsara or Anthracites Revision of the Indo-Australian Conocephalinae, part 3. Zootaxa 4046: 1-300. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.4046.1.1 Ingrisch S (2021) New species and records of the genus Lipotactes (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Lipotactinae) from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Thailand. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30: 51-65. https://doi. org/10.3897/jor.30.58095 Jin XB (1992) Taxonomic revision and phylogeny of the tribe Phisidini (Insecta: Grylloptera: Meconematidae) In: Jin XB, Kevan DKM (Eds) Theses Zoologicae, 18 pp. [i-vii + 1-360.] Jin XB, Liu X, Wang H (2020) New taxa of the tribe Meconematini from South-Pacific and Indo-Malayan Regions (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Meconematinae). Zootaxa 4772: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.4772.1.1 Libersat F Hoy RR (1991) Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 169: 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197663 Mason A, Bailey W (1998) Ultrasound hearing and male-male commu- nication in Australian katydids (Tettigoniidae: Zaprochilinae) with sexually dimorphic ears. Physiological Entomology 23: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.1998.232069.x Mason AC, Morris GK, Wall P (1991) High ultrasonic hearing and tym- panal slit function in rainforest katydids. Naturwissenschaften 78: 365-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131611 Montealegre-Z F (2012) Reverse stridulatory wing motion produces highly resonant calls in a neotropical katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Pseudophyllinae). Journal of Insect Physiology 58: 116-124. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.10.006 Montealegre-Z F (2009) Scale effects and constraints for sound production in katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): correlated evolution between morphology and signal parameters. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01652.x Montealegre-Z F Mason AC (2005) The mechanics of sound production in Panacanthus pallicornis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae): the stridulatory motor patterns. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1219-1237. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01526 Montealegre-Z F, Morris GK (1999) Songs and systematics of some Tettigoniidae from Colombia and Ecuador I. Pseudophyllinae (Orthoptera). Journal of Orthoptera Research 8: 163-236. https:// doi.org/10.2307/3503439 Montealegre-Z FE, Morris GK, Mason AC (2006) Generation of extreme ultrasonics in rainforest katydids. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 4923-4937. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02608 Montealegre-Z FE Ogden J, Jonsson T, Soulsbury CD (2017) Morphological determinants of signal peak frequency in katydids (Orthoptera): a comparative analysis using biophysical evidence of wing vibration. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30: 2068-2078. https://doi. org/10.1111/jeb.13179 23 Montealegre-Z F, Postles M (2010) Resonant sound production in Copiphora gorgonensis (Tettigoniidae: Copiphorini), an endemic species from parque nacional natural gorgona, Colombia. Journal of Orthoptera Research 19: 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1665/034.019.0223 Morris GK (1999) Song in arthropods. In: Davey KG (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Reproduction, Vol. 4, Academic Press, San Diego, 508-517. Morris GK, Mason AC, Wall P, Belwood JJ (1994) High ultrasonic and tremulation signals in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Journal of Zoology 233: 129-163. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05266.x Morris GK, Pipher RE (1967) Tegminal amplifiers and spectrum consist- encies in Conocephalus nigropleurum (Bruner), Tettigoniidae. Journal of Insect Physiology 13: 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 1910(67)90109-6 Morris GK, Pipher RE (1972) The relation of song structure to tegminal movement in Metrioptera sphagnorum (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Canadian Entomologist 104: 977-985. https://doi.org/10.4039/ Ent104977-7 Mugleston JD, Naegle M, Song H, Whiting MF (2018) A comprehensive phylogeny of Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera) reveals extensive ecomorph convergence and widespread taxonomic incongruence. In- sect Systematics and Diversity 2: 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixy010 R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical comput- ing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. [program] Riede K (1996) Diversity of sound-producing insects in a Bornean lowland rainforest. In: Edwards DS, Booth WE, Choy SC (Eds) Tropical rainforest research—current issues. Dordrecht: Springer, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1685-2_8 Riede K (1997) Bioacoustic diversity and resource partitioning in tropi- cal calling communities. In: Ulrich H (Ed.) Tropical biodiversity and systematics. Bonn: Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, 275-280. Robillard T, Grandcolas P, Desutter-Grandcolas L (2007) A shift toward harmonics for high-frequency calling shown with phylogenetic study of frequency spectra in Eneopterinae crickets (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Eneopteridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 85: 1264-1275. https:// doi.org/10.1139/Z07-106 Robillard T, ter Hofstede HM, Orivel J, Vicente NM (2015) Bioacoustics of the neotropical eneopterinae (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Gryllidae). Bioacoustics 24: 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2014.9 96915 Romer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170174 Sarria-S FA, Buxton K, Jonsson T, Montealegre-Z F (2016) Wing mechanics, vibrational and acoustic communication in a new bush-cricket spe- cies of the genus Copiphora (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Colom- bia. Zoologischer Anzeiger—A Journal of Comparative Zoology 263: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2016.04.008 Sarria-S FA, Morris GK, Windmill JE, Jackson J, Montealegre-Z F (2014) Shrinking wings for ultrasonic pitch production: hyperintense ultra-short-wavelength calls in a new genus of neotropical katy- dids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). PLoS ONE 9: e98708. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098708 Sueur J, Gasc A, Grandcolas P, Pavoine S (2012) Global estimation of an- imal diversity using automatic acoustic sensors. In: Le Gaillard J-F, Guarini J-M, Gaill F (Eds) Sensors for Ecology. Towards Integrated Knowledge of Ecosystems. Paris: CNRS, 99-117. Tan MK (2011) The Copiphorini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephali- nae) in Singapore. Nature in Singapore 4: 31-42. Tan MK (2012) New species of Glenophisis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Hexacentrinae) from Singapore, with key to species. Zootaxa 3185: 64-68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3185.1.5 Tan MK (2014) An annotated checklist of the bush katydids (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae: Phaneropterinae) from Singapore, including an illustrated key to species. Zootaxa 3884: 573-593. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.3884.6.6 JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1) 24 Tan MK (2017) Orthoptera in the Bukit Timah and Central Catchment Nature Reserves (Part 2): Suborder Ensifera. 2™’ edn. Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singa- pore, 101 pp. [Uploaded 16 June 2017] Tan MK, Artchawakom T (2017) Taxonomic review of Alloteratura katydid (Orthoptera: Meconematinae) with the description of one new spe- cies from Thailand. Zootaxa 4226: 103-112. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.4226.1.5 Tan MK, Choi J, Shankar N (2017) Trends in new species discovery of Orthoptera (Insecta) from Southeast Asia. Zootaxa 4238: 127-134. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4238.1.10 Tan MK, Dawwrueng D, Artchawakom T (2015) Taxonomic review of Kuzicus Gorochov, 1993 (Tettigoniidae: Meconematinae), with two new species from Thailand and key to species. Zootaxa 3999: 279- 290. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3999.2.7 Tan MK, Ingrisch S (2014) New taxa and notes of some described spe- cies of Agraeciini (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae) from Malay Peninsula. Zootaxa 3765: 541-556. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.3765.6.3 Tan MK, Ingrisch S, Robillard T, Baroga-Barbecho JB, Yap SA (2018) New taxa and notes on spine-headed katydids (Orthoptera: Conocephali- nae: Agraeciini) from the Philippines. Zootaxa 4462: 331-348. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4462.3.2 Tan MK, Ingrisch S$, Wahab RA, Japir R, Chung AYC (2020a) Ultrasonic bioacoustics and stridulum morphology reveal cryptic species among Lipotactes big-eyed katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Lipotactinae) from Borneo. Systematics and Biodiversity 18: 510-524. https://doi. org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1769223 Tan MK, Jin XB, Baroga-Barbecho JB, Yap SA (2020b) Taxonomy and bioacoustics of Meconematinae (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Laguna (Philippines: Luzon) Zootaxa 4732: 527-544. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.4732.4.2 M. KAI TAN, J. DUNCAN, R.H.A. WAHAB, C-Y. LEE, R. JAPIR, A.Y.C. CHUNG, J.B. BAROGA-BARBECHO ET AL. Tan MK, Japir R, Chung AYC (2019a) Uncovering the Grylloidea and Tettigonioidea (Orthoptera: Ensifera) in the Forest Research Centre (Sepilok) Entomological Collection. Zootaxa 4701: 301-349. https:// doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4701.4.1 Tan MK, Malem J, Legendre F Dong J, Baroga-Barbecho JB, Yap SA, Wahab RA, Japir R, Chung AYC, Robillard T (2021) Phylogeny, systematics and evolution of calling songs of the Lebinthini crickets (Orthoptera, Gryl- loidea, Eneopterinae), with description of two new genera. Systematic Entomology 46: 1060-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12510 Tan MK, Montealegre-Z F, Wahab RA, Lee CY, Belabut DM, Japir R, Chung AYC (2019b) Ultrasonic songs and stridulum anatomy of Asiophlugis crystal predatory katydids (Tettigonioidea: Meconematinae: Phlugi- dini). Bioacoustics 29: 619-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622 .2019.1637783 Tan MK, Robillard T (2021) Highly diversified circadian rhythms in the calling activity of eneopterine crickets (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Gryllidae) from Southeast Asia. Bioacoustics 31(4): 470-489. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2021.1973562 ter Hofstede HM, Kalko EK, Fullard JH (2010) Auditory-based defense against gleaning bats in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 196: 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0518-4 ter Hofstede HM, Symes LB, Martinson SJ, Robillard T, Faure P, Madhusudhana §S, Page RA (2020) Calling songs of neotropical katy- dids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Panama. Journal of Orthoptera Research 29: 137-201. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.46371 Walker TJ, Dew D (1972) Wing movements of calling katydids: fid- dling finesse. Science 178: 174-176. https://doi.org/10.1126/sci- ence.178.4057.174 Willemse C (1959) Notes on the genus Salomona Blanchard (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, subfam. Agraecinae) Publicaties van het Natuurhis- torisch Genootschap in Limburg 11 [1958-1959]: 1-118. [pls 1-43] JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2023, 32(1)