Short Communication Journal of Orthoptera Research 2021, 30(1): 31-33 The luring mantid: Protrusible pheromone glands in Sfenophylla lobivertex (Mantodea: Acanthopidae) CHRISTIAN J. SCHWARZ!, FRANK GLAW? 1 Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Conservation Biology Unit, Ruhr University Bochum, ND 1/31, Universitatsstrafe 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany. 2 Zoologische Staatssammlung Miinchen (ZSM-SNSB), Miinchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Miinchen, Germany. Corresponding author: Frank Glaw (glaw@snsb.de) Academic editor: Matan Shelomi | Received 9 June 2020 | Accepted 18 August 2020 | Published 21 April 2021 http://zoobank.org/184722BE-617D-47E5-A7DE-0026FD626DC2 Citation: Schwarz CJ, Glaw F (2021) The luring mantid: Protrusible pheromone glands in Stenophylla lobivertex (Mantodea: Acanthopidae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(1): 31-33. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.55274 Abstract The hitherto unknown pheromone gland of female Stenophylla lobiver- tex Lombardo, 2000, a poorly understood praying mantis distributed in the Neotropics, is described and figured. In contrast to other mantodeans, this species has a protrusible, bifurcated (Y-shaped) gland of 6 mm length. It is protracted by sexually receptive females during nighttime and only when undisturbed. The significance of this morphological and behavioral adaptation is discussed in light of the reproductive strategy of the species and its assumed rarity in the natural habitat. Keywords Calling behavior, Neotropics, praying mantis, reproductive strategy Introduction Morphologically and phylogenetically unique taxa often ex- hibit traits not found in related groups (Pavoine et al. 2005, Red- ding et al. 2008). Such traits might provide crucial information on the evolution of morphological and behavioral characters that cannot be inferred from the study of their relatives alone. Among insects, notable examples are the stenopelmatoid ensiferan Coolo- ola Rentz, 1980 (Rentz 1999), the phasmatodean Dryococelus Gur- ney, 1947 (Buckley et al. 2008), and the mantodean Metallyticus Westwood, 1835 (Wieland 2008). This also highlights the impor- tance of including such taxa in phylogenetic analyses. Mate attraction is facilitated through pheromones in many in- sect taxa, and praying mantises (Mantodea) are no exception. Be- havioral experiments suggesting pheromone emission of praying mantis females were first described by Kelner-Pillault (1957), who observed a caged European mantis female (Mantis religiosa Lin- naeus, 1758) attracting males from surrounding habitats. Mean- while, several observations in captivity and in the wild have docu- mented pheromone-emitting behavior in many mantodeans (e.g,, Edmunds 1975, Robinson and Robinson 1979; Hurd et al. 2004; Gemeno et al. 2005; Perez 2005, Holwell et al. 2007, Maxwell et al. 2010, Berg et al. 2011, Schwarz 2018). Hurd et al. (2004) were the first to show that a pheromone is indeed produced by sexually active female mantodeans. During the attracting behavior, usually named “calling”, the apex of the abdomen is bent ventrad in long-winged species (to an extreme in Acanthopinae; Robinson and Robinson 1979), expos- ing the intersegmental membrane between the sixth and seventh tergite, where the pheromone gland is located. In the groups stud- ied so far, this membrane protrudes, at most, very slightly. Here, we present a unique sexual attraction mechanism exhib- ited by the leaf-like mantis Stenophylla lobivertex Lombardo, 2000, a member of the exclusively Neotropical family Acanthopidae (Schwarz and Roy 2019). Materials and methods We observed and documented the behavior of four females from November 2017 to June 2018 (N = 1) and from October 2019 to March 2020 (N = 3). The first observations were made by the second author in a female from the Panguana research station (9°37'S, 74°56'W, 260 m a.s.l.) in Amazonian Peru. Three addi- tional females were part of a captive bred stock, likewise from Peru, obtained by the first author from a Mantodea breeder in Germany. Results As in other species studied so far, the pheromone gland of Stenophylla lobivertex is located between the sixth and seventh ter- gite. It is inflated into a Y-shaped structure during calling and usu- ally sticks out almost vertically from the body (Fig. 1), but each lobe can also be moved in a tentacle-like manner. The fully inflated organ is 6 mm long, about 1 mm thick at both ends and filled with haemolymph, which gives the organ a greenish-blue appearance. Tracheae can be seen shining through the thin membrane. The captive stock females continued to call after being mated multiple times but produced unfertile oothecae, indicating that the copulations might have been unsuccessful. Our observations so far suggest that calling behavior is reduced in females older than six months. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2021, 30(1) C.J. SCHWARZ AND FE. GLAW Fig. 1. Pheromone gland of Stenophylla lobivertex. A. Lateral view of calling female; B. Pheromone gland in anterolateral view; C. Phero- mone gland in posterolateral view. Photos by C. J. Schwarz. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2021, 30(1) C.J. SCHWARZ AND FE. GLAW Calling in Stenophylla occurred, like in other mantodeans, over the course of 2-5 hours per night and only in deep darkness and when undisturbed. Temperature during the observational period reached 26 to 29°C by day and 22 to 24°C by night, at 70-90% relative humidity. The protraction of the gland occurred over the course of several minutes, but upon disturbances, such as vibra- tions or illumination by artificial lights, the pheromone gland was retracted instantly. Discussion So far, Stenophylla lobivertex is the only species of more than 2,500 known mantodean species whose pheromone gland has evolved into a distinct, inflatable morphological structure. While the pheromone glands can attain the shape of a pair of small bulg- es in some other taxa (e.g., Acanthopinae, Tarachodes Burmeister, 1838: Edmunds 1975, Robinson and Robinson 1979), no other known mantodean inflates its pheromone gland into a Y-shaped structure. However, the two congeners of S. lobivertex might pos- sess a similar structure. The significance of this unique structure remains speculative at this point, but we argue that this type of protrusible gland with its increased surface might be able to distribute phero- mones more efficiently than the less elaborate glands of other mantodean species. This structure might, therefore, help to as- sure efficient mate finding in a species apparently characterized by low population density in combination with a short repro- ductive period. Stenophylla are rarely observed in nature, and only a handful of specimens of the three known species are present in museum collections. The rarity of this taxon might be partly due to its re- productive K strategy (MacArthur and Wilson 1967). Preliminary observations on captive specimens revealed that females pro- duce only 3-5 oothecae during their lifetime, which contain at most 30 eggs (R6nisch and Schwarz 2019). Females guard their egg cases until the young hatch; the hatchlings are 13 mm long (as compared to 40-44 mm in adults). The natural phenology of Stenophylla is unknown, but during more than 35 years of regular collections at the Panguana field station in Peru, adult specimens (deposited in the Staatliches Museum fiir Naturkunde, Karlsruhe [SMNK], the Zoologische Staatssammlung Miinchen [ZSM], and in the collection of CJS) were only found in the months of August to October (Schwarz et al. 2020). The specimens of the type series were captured in October and November (Lombardo 2000). Find- ing a sexual partner when population density is low and adults are not found year-round is challenging. This is especially true in a highly complex rainforest ecosystem and thus may explain the need for an elaborate and “safe-proof” sexual attraction mecha- nism in this mantodean. Acknowledgments We thank the Peruvian nature conservation authority and for- estry office [Servicio Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre (SERFOR), Minis- terio de Agricultura y Riego (MINAGRI)] for collection and export permits (SERFOR 2014-2019: No. 007-2014-SERFOR-DGGSPFFS + No. 0406-2017-SERFOR-DGGSPFFS; SERFOR 2014-2019: No. 0000326-SERFOR - No. 003492-SERFOR). Thomas R6nisch (B6- blingen, Germany) and the members of the Panguana collection team provided Stenophylla specimens, in particular Ernst-Gerhard Burmeister (ZSM) and Amelie Hécherl. 33 References Berg M, Schwarz CJ, Mehl JE (2011) Die Gottesanbeterin, Mantis religiosa. Die Neue Brehm-Bicherei Bd. 656, Westarp Wissenschaften, Hohen- wardsleben, 521 pp. Buckley TR, Attanayake D, Bradler S (2008) Extreme convergence in stick insect evolution: phylogenetic placement of the Lord Howe Island tree lobster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 1055-1062. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1552 Edmunds M (1975) Courtship, mating and possible sex pheromones in three species of Mantodea. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 111: 53-57. Gemeno C, Claramunt J, Dasca J (2005) Nocturnal calling behavior in mantids. Journal of Insect Behavior 18: 389-403. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10905-005-3698-y Holwell GI, Barry KL, Herberstein ME (2007) Mate location, antennal morphology, and ecology in two praying mantids (Insecta: Manto- dea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 307-313. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00788.x Hurd LE, Prete FR, Jones TH, Singh TB, Co JE, Portman RT (2004) First identification of a putative sex pheromone in a praying mantid. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1023/ B:JOEC.0000013188.79411.18 Kelner-Pillault S (1957) Attirance sexuelle chez Mantis religiosa. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 62: 9-11. Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, syn- onymis, locis. Tomus 1, editio decima, reformata, Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, Stockholm, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 Lombardo F (2000) Stenophylla lobivertex, a new species of Stenophylli- nae from Amazonia (Insecta, Mantodea). Studies in Neotropical Fauna and Environment 35: 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1076/0165- 0521(200004)35:1;1-M;FT034 MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ), 224 pp. Maxwell MR, Barry KL, Johns PM (2010) Examinations of female pher- omone use in two praying mantids, Stagmomantis limbata and Tenodera aridifolia sinensis (Mantodea: Mantidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103: 120-127. https://doi. org/10.1603/008.103.0115 Pavoine S, Ollier S, Dufour A-B (2005) Is the originality of a species meas- urable? Ecology Letters 8: 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461- 0248.2005.00752.x Perez B (2005) Calling behaviour in the female praying mantis, Hiero- dula patellifera. Physiological Entomology 30: 42-47. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.0307-6962.2005.00426.x Redding DW, Hartmann K, Mimoto A, Bokal D, DeVos M, Mooers A® (2008) Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylo- genetic diversity than expected. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251: 606-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.12.006 Rentz DCF (1999) Pearson’s Monster, a new species of Cooloola Rentz from Queensland (Orthoptera: Cooloolidae). Journal of Orthoptera Re- search 8: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503421 Robinson MH, Robinson B (1979) By dawn’s early light: Matutinal mating and sex attractants in a Neotropical mantid. Science 205: 825-827. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.205.4408.825 R6nisch T, Schwarz CJ (2019) Die “Drachenmantis” Stenophylla lobivertex. Zoologischer Zentral-Anzeiger 2019: 50-52. Schwarz CJ (2018) Extravagante Schonheiten - die Gattung Metallyticus im Terrarium. Reptilia 134: 30-34. Schwarz CJ, Roy R (2019) The systematics of Mantodea revisited: an up- dated classification incorporating multiple data sources (Insecta: Dic- tyoptera). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (NS) 55: 101-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2018.1556567 Schwarz CJ, Ehrmann R, Stiewe MBD, MoOrtter R, Falkenberg M (2020) Mantodea of Panguana (Insecta: Dictyoptera). Zootaxa 4824: 1-66. Wieland F (2008) The genus Metallyticus reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea). Species, Phylogeny and Evolution 1: 147-170. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 2021, 30(1)