JHR 45:55-63 (2015) gem eq, JOURNAL OF Seemiet sree doi: 10.3897/JHR.45.8612 Met Hymenopter a http://jhr.pensoft.net The inerational Society of ymenoptersts RESEARCH Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cremastinae) Marina Mazén!'?3, Santiago Bordera” | Universidad Nacional Experimental Sur del Lago “Jestis Maria Semprum”, Santa Barbara del Zulia, Ve- nezuela 2 Instituto Jardin Botdnico de Mérida, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Apartado 52, Mérida 5212, Venezuela 3 Laboratorio de Ecologta de Insectos, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes. Nucleo La Hechicera, Mérida 5212, Venezuela 4 Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales/Instituto de Investigacién de Biodiversidad “CIBIO”, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. Correos 99, 03080 Alicante, Espana Corresponding author: Marina Mazén (marinamazonmor@gmail.com) Academic editor: G. Broad| Received 17 September 2014 | Accepted 20 March 2015 | Published 7 September 2015 Attp://zoobank.org/D1939E27-BE46-47FC-ACD8-FACOB40B598C Citation: Mazén M, Bordera S (2015) Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cremastinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 45: 55—63. doi: 10.3897/JHR.45.8612 Abstract ‘The presence of one or two spurs on the mid tibia has been widely used as a diagnostic character in many taxa, but it has been discovered to be a highly variable character in the Cremastinae genus Eucremastus. Variation in the number of mid tibial spurs and occurrence of asymmetry in this genus was studied. The anomalies observed in this character are classified into three categories. Other non-cremastine genera traditionally characterized by having a single mid tibial spur were studied, but no anomalies were found. The taxonomic implications of this variation are discussed. Keywords Eucremastus, spurs, morphological traits, fluctuating asymmetry Copyright Marina Mazon, Santiago Bordera. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 56 M. Mazén & S. Bordera / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 45: 55-63 (2015) Introduction Fluctuating asymmetry refers to the random deviation from perfect symmetry in bilateral traits (Van Halen 1962, Parsons 1990). It is more frequent in sexually selected traits, and it has been proposed as an important force for sexual selection (Moller and Pomi- ankowski 1993). Fluctuating asymmetry in morphological traits has been suggested to be the result of environmental (Silva et al. 2009) or genetic stress (Smith et al. 1997) during ontogeny, although this relationship remains unclear (Bjorksten et al. 2000). When asymmetry affects morphological characters with taxonomic importance, its diagnostic value is reduced since it gives rise to different states of that character, some- times in the same individual, and contributes to potentially misleading taxonomic descriptions and identifications. The number and relative size of mid tibial spurs in Ichneumonidae has been con- sidered a relatively invariant taxonomic character. The presence of a single mid tibial spur has been used in the diagnostic description of a tribe, Exenterini, of the subfamily Tryphoninae (Townes 1969a), but mostly at the generic level, e.g. Metopius Panzer (Townes 1971, Gauld et al. 2002), Acerataspis Uchida (males) (Townes 1971) (ME- TOPIINAE); Anomalon Panzer (Gauld 1997), Liopterna Townes, Calcaneum Townes and Ophionellus Westwood (Townes 1971) (ANOMALONINAE), or even at species level in Ophioninae (Gauld and Mitchell 1978). As a general rule, the Cremastinae, a cosmopolitan group rather common in dry open areas (Gauld 2000) have two spurs on both the mid and hind tibiae. However, there is one genus, Eucremastus Szépligeti, which is characterized by having only one mid tibial spur (Fig. 1) (Townes 1971). Some authors (Ceballos 1921, Sedivy and Narolsky 2001) pointed out the presence of two spurs in several specimens of E. manni (Tschek). Moreover, E. villiersi (Benoit) form turkmeniensis was described as having two distinct mid tibial spurs in the female (Narolsky 2001), which highlights how vari- able the presence of one or two spurs is in this genus. Nevertheless, the occurrence of asymmetry in this character has not been reported, but it was found in some specimens of E. manni and E. collaris Narolsky from different collections. These circumstances suggest not only that the presence of one or two spurs on the mid tibiae of Eucremastus may be a more variable feature that was considered until now, but also that this genus may present fluctuating asymmetry associated with this character. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the variability of this character par- ticularly in Eucremastus but also in other genera characterized by having a single mid tibial spur, and to investigate the occurrence of fluctuating asymmetry in this genus. Material and methods Studied material of this genus belongs to the following institutions: CEUA University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti.. 57 ZISP Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia. BMNH_ Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom. HNHM Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest, Hungary. MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain. In order to establish the importance of variability, we also studied some material belonging to other Ichneumonidae genera which traditionally have been separated by having a single mid tibial spur. This material is preserved in the following institutions: 1) University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain (CEUA). 2) Zoological Museum of University of Turku, Turku, Finland (ZMUT). 3) Coleccién Entomolédgica Regional of Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Mérida, Mexico (CER-UADY). 4) Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., USA (USNM). We considered the morphological structure to be anomalous when deviations from normality occurred in any specimens belonging to one species, which usually did not possess these anomalies. Normality is the commonest state of the character, and is defined as Type 0, as follows: Type 0: both mid tibiae with a single long spur. The variability of anomalies found in the studied material was classified into 3 categories, as follows: Type 1: both mid tibiae with two unequal spurs. Type 2: one single spur on a mid tibia and a long spur clearly developed jointly with a very small stump on the other mid tibia (Fig. 2). Type 3: two distinct spurs on a mid tibia (Figs 3 and 5) and a long spur clearly devel- oped jointly with a short stump on the other mid tibia (Figs 4 and 6). Type 1 is a symmetric anomaly, while types 2 and 3 are asymmetric anomalies. Since anomalies have been found only in two species (i. e. E. manni and E. collaris), we will report only the material belonging to these two species, although some individuals of £. villiersi (Benoit) (11 specimens, including holotype, ZISP) and E. parvipes (Morley) (holotype, BMNH) were also checked. Eucremastus vil- liersi form turkmeniensis may be considered to represent an anomaly type 1; how- ever, we did not see any material belonging to this form, thus it is not included in the material studied. As for the other non-cremastine genera, we only report data from specimens at the genus level, since most of the material we examined was only sorted to genera. Fluctuating asymmetry is usually measured as the mean difference between right and left sides (Palmer and Strobeck 1986). However, since we measured the mid tibia spurs asymmetries qualitatively (i.e., type 2 and 3 anomalies), we present the frequency distribution of asymmetry by considering type 2 and 3 anomalies as both sides’ asym- metries, respectively, and both type 1 and type 0 anomalies as bilateral symmetries. 58 M. Mazén & S. Bordera / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 45: 55-63 (2015) x150 0 ©6©.200u x15 200um Figures 1-6. Mid tibial spurs of Eucremastus manni: | mid tibia without anomalies 2 type 2 anomaly in specimen from Turkey, right leg 3-6 type 3 anomalies in specimens from Spain: 3=4 right leg and left leg, respectively, of specimen from Fresneda 5=6 right leg and left leg, respectively, of specimen from Rafa del Pocico. The white arrows point to the stump of the spur. Scanning Electron Microscopy studies were done using a Hitachi S-3000N (Uni- versity of Alicante, Spain) and a LEO 1455VPL (Natural History Museum, United Kingdom), both in low vacuum mode. Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti.. 59 Results In this paper we examined a total of 60 specimens belonging to Eucremastus manni and E. collaris. We found mid tibial spur anomalies in seven specimens. These are detailed below and summarized in Table 1. We also examined 347 specimens belonging to other genera with a single mid tibial spur, but no anomalies were found. Asymmetries (i.e. type 2 and 3 anomalies) were only found in E. manni. About 90% of E. manni individuals were symmetrical, and asymmetries occurred at very low frequency (Fig. 7). Material studied belonging to Eucremastus Eucremastus manni: SpAIN (HNHM): Genotype, “Murcia”, Staud., 1895, Eucremastus brevicornis Szépligeti 1905, 1 9. Sparn (CEUA): Alicante: Sierra Mariola, Foia Am- pla, 4-17/V1-2002, 1 9, Malaise trap; Font Roja, Mas de Sant Ignaci, 17-VI/2- VII-2002, 1 9, Malaise trap. Ciudad Real: Fresneda, 29-V/17-VI-2004, 1 9, TM; 17-V1/5-V1I-2004, 1 2, Malaise trap (anomaly type 3); Rafa del Pocico, 18-V- 2004, in Thapsia villosa, 1 3 (anomaly type 3). Spars (MNCN): Avila: Navalperal (no date), 1 9. Alicante: Alicante (no date), 1 4; Orihuela / Arneva, VI-1925, 1 9. Asturias: Villaviciosa (no date), 1 2 (anomaly type 3). Ciudad Real: Pozuelo, 1897, 1 9. Madrid: Buitrago, 24-VI-1984, 2 3; El Pardo, 16-VI-1941, 2 99; El Esco- rial (no date), 2 99 2 33; 6-VII-1914, 1 9; 17-VI-1915, 1 9 2 @@; 14-V1-1916, 1B; 19-VI-1918, 1 9; 14-VI-1922, 1 9; 8-IV-1929, 1 3; 8-VI-1929, 19232; Alcala (no date), 1 9 (anomaly type 1); Madrid (no date), 8 99 1 4; VI-1993, 1 4; San Agustin, 8-VI-1912, 1 2; Sierra de Guadarrama, 25-VI-1910, 1 9; 21-VI- 1911, 1 Q; 25-VI-1916, 1 4; 23-VI-1932, 1 @; Torrelaguna, 3-VI-1986, 2 bo. Segovia: La Granja (no date), 1 9. Valladolid: Tordesillas, 26-VI-1930, 1 9 (left leg missing, right leg with two unequal spurs). TURKEY (BMNH): Adana, Ciftehan, 26-V-1960, Guichard & Harvey, 1 9 (anomaly type 2); Amasya, 31-V-1959, K.M. Guichard, 1 9 (anomaly type 2), 1 2; Erzurum, Kandil, 11-VI-1962, Guichard & Harvey, 1 9. GREECE (BMNH): near Keffsia, 18/VI/1957, G. Mavromoustakis, 2 OQ. One specimen (ZISP) labeled “Escorial, Dusmet”, 1 9. Eucremastus collaris: Arm. CCP (ZISP): Paratype, “Hosrovskii zap-k, Bediiskii uzh. arzhovoe redkolesye”, A. Kotenko, 29-VI-1981, 1 9 (anomaly type 1); Paratypes, OO: Material studied belonging to other genera Anomaloninae Anomaton spp.: Ecuapor (USNM, currently on loan to ZMUT): Dept. Orellana: Tiputini, 1998, 22 99° 9 4, Leg. T. Erwin; Onkone Gare, 1998, 1 9, Leg. T. 60 M. Mazén & S. Bordera / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 45: 55-63 (2015) Erwin. Dept. Zamora-Chinchipe: Reserva Biolégica San Francisco, 2009, 13 2° 1 3, Leg. M. Pollet & A. Braekeleer. PERU (ZMUT): Dept. Madre de Dios: Los Amigos, 2008, 37 9°, Leg. Gémez; Iquitos, 1998-2000, 73 29, Leg. Ilari Saak- sjarvi et al. Peru (USNM, currently on loan to ZMUT):Tambopata River, 1998, 2 29, Leg. T. Erwin; Manu River, 1998, 2 9° 1d, Leg. T. Erwin. Dept. Loreto: Napo River, 1998, 1 2, Leg. T. Erwin; Sparn (CEUA): Alicante: Mariola Moun- tain, 2001-2002, 15 99, Leg. CIBIO; Carrasqueta Mountain, 2001-2002, 7 99, Leg. CIBIO. Ciudad Real: Cabafieros National Park, 2004, 64 9°, Leg. CIBIO. Ophionellus sp.: Ecuapor (USNM, currently on loan to ZMUT): Dept. Orellana: Onkone Gare, 2005-2006, 8 99 7 4d, Leg. T. Erwin. Peru (ZMUT): Dept. Lo- reto: Iquitos, 2000, 1 &, Leg. Ilari Saaksjarvi. Dept. Madre de Dios: Los Amigos, 2008, 30 29, Leg. Gomez. Metopiinae Metopius sp.: Ecuapor (USNM, currently on loan to ZMUT): Dept. Orellana: Ti- putini, 1998, 1 9 1 3, Leg. T. Erwin. Mexico (CER-UADY): Yucatan: El Cuyo, 2009, 3 6d, Leg. A. Gonzalez. Peru (ZMUT): Dept. Loreto: Iquitos, Alpahuayo I, 2000, 12 99 444, Leg. Ilari Saaksjarvi et al. Dept. Madre de Dios: Los Ami- gos, 2008, 3 29° 1 4, Leg. Gomez. aN =) nA o ! Relative frequency (0) Ss & bo t=) = 6u6 asymmetry type 2 symmetric asymmetry type 3 Figure 7. Frequency distribution of fluctuating asymmetries of mid tibial spurs in EF. manni. Symmetric means both type 0 and anomaly type 1. Table |. Sample size of examined material and proportions of anomaly occurrence (between brackets), by species and by sex. Anomaly occurzence = 512.2%) : 116399 E cll 135.3%) Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti.. 61 Tryphoninae Cycasis sp.: SPAIN (CEUA): Alicante: Carrasqueta Mountain, 2002, 6 3, Leg. CIBIO; Mariola Mountain, 2002, 499 4 42, Leg. CIBIO. Ciudad Real: Cabafieros Na- tional Park, 2004, 10 46, Leg. CIBIO. Exyston sp.: GREECE (CEUA): Lesbos Island, Vatoussa, 2001, 1 ’, Leg. Rojo & Pérez. Kristotomus sp.: Spain (CEUA): Ciudad Real: Cabaferos National Park, 2004, 10 53, Leg. CIBIO. Discussion About one in 10 individuals of FE. manni had asymmetric spurs, more frequently in fe- males. Since we measured a discrete variable, fluctuating asymmetry could not be test- ed, but the occurrence of asymmetry at this relatively high proportion would suggest this genus would be particularly sensitive to environmental or genetic stress. Therefore, given the growing interest in the use of fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of develop- mental instability, and hence of environmental stress during development (Hogg et al. 2001, Silva et al. 2009, amongst others), this character may be used for this purpose by measuring the relative size of each spur on each mid tibia. Despite the apparently low sample size of our study, we must underline that this frequency of anomalies is note- worthy considering that the genus Eucremastus is rather rare in collections. Fluctuating asymmetry has not been measured in Ichneumonidae, although isolated teratologies have been reported (Kerrich 1934, Bordera and Tormos 1986). Not only asymmetry but the overall high rate of variation in the presence of one or two mid tibial spurs in some species of Eucremastus invalidates this character for taxonomic diagnosis of this genus, although not in other taxa, since anomalies were absent in other genera that usually have a single mid tibial spur. According to this, we redefine the diagnostic characters of Eucremastus, and provide some features that sepa- rate it from related genera (Table 2). Table 2. Diagnostic characters to distinguish amongst some related genera in Cremastinae. Noxocremastus carina of pronotum Lee Lower tooth clearly Mandibles Resins ae oun begaerroaease Teeth of equal length | longer than upper variable long as upper tooth tooth Lateral carina of Absent or weak Reaching the apex Absent or weak Absent scutellum Ovipositor tip Sealenge Straight Downcurved Downcurved downcurved Touching or running Touching or Ventral edges of first Touching along a Touching along a tergite distance longer than | distance longer than parle ver core aldne) spprescuing aong.a 8 a distance longer than | distance shorter than Eg OE ee Ole: | Le a CUP the width of petiole _| the width of petiole Glymma Shallow Shallow Distinct Shallow 62 M. Mazén & S. Bordera / Journal of Hymenoptera Research 45: 55-63 (2015) Eucremastus Szépligeti, 1905 Wings moderately darkened. Occipital carina interrupted above. Frons concave. Genal carina joining oral carina very close to base of mandible. Lower tooth of mandible nearly twice as long as upper tooth. Pronotum slightly convex, without a median lon- gitudinal carina. Scutellum rather convex, with a strong lateral carina reaching its apex. Hind femur without tooth beneath. Mid tibia with one or two spurs, when two spurs are present they are of unequal length. Ventral edges of first tergite touching each other, enclosing sternite in its middle. Glymma present, short and oblique. Ovipositor sheath about 1.5 x longer than hind tibia. Ovipositor tip almost straight. Acknowledgements We are very grateful to the curators of Hymenoptera collections in the Museums we were working at: Gavin Broad, from Natural History Museum (London, United Kingdom), Sandor Csész, from Hungarian Natural History Museum (Budapest, Hungary), Ilari Saaksjarvi, from Zoological Museum of University of Turku (Turku, Finland) and to Isabel Izquierdo and Mercedes Paris, from Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (Madrid, Spain), as well as to Dmitri Kasparyan, leading research scientist of Department of Hymenoptera in Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia), for their valuable and helpful assistance. Our thanks to Alejandra Gonzalez- Moreno and Isrrael Gémez for letting us study material they collected. We also want to express our sincere gratitude to the staff of Cabaferos National Park for giving us facilities and permission for collecting material in this protected area. This research received support from the SYNTHESYS Project http://www.syn- thesys.info/, which is financed by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP6 and FP7. It was also partially supported by Project 040/2002 from Ministerio de Medio Ambiente of Spanish Government and by a grant to the second author from the University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain (Programa Propi del Vicerectorat d’Investigacid, Desenvolupament i Innovacid per al Foment de la I+D+I — 2014; Ref. ACIE14—03) for a research stay in ZMUT. References Bjorksten T, David P, Pomiankowski A, Fowler K (2000) Fluctuating asymmetry of sexu- al and nonsexual traits in stalk-eyed flies: a poor indicator of developmental stress and genetic quality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13(1): 89-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1420- 9101.2000.00146.x Bordera S, Tormos J (1986) Un bracénido y tres ichneuménidos teratolégicos (Hym., Ichneu- monoidea). Boletin de la Asociacién espafola de Entomologia 10: 335-338. Variability and fluctuating asymmetry of mid tibial spurs in Eucremastus Szépligeti.. 63 Gauld I (1997) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 2. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 57: 1-485. Gauld I (2000) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 63: 1-453. Gauld I, Mitchell PA (1978) The taxonomy, distribution and host preferences of African parasitic wasps of the subfamily Ophioninae. CAB: Slough. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, 1-287. Gauld I, Sithole R, Ugalde G, Godoy C (2002) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 4. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 66: 1-768. Kerrich GJ (1934) A new case of teratology in Ichneumonidae. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 70: 61-62. Kolarov JA (1980) A new Cremastinae genus and species from Bulgaria (Hymenoptera, Ichneu- monidae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 16: 90-92. Kolarov JA (1992) New and little known Cremastinae species in Bulgarian fauna and a key for identification of the Western Palearctic genera (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 44: 75-78. Moller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89: 267-279. doi: 10.1007/BF02424520 Narolsky NB (1990) New data on the Cremastinae wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from Kazakhstan and Central Asia. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 69(7): 63-68. Narolsky NB (1993) Ichneumonid wasps of Noxocremastus genus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumoni- dae, Cremastinae) from Palaearctic. Zhurnal Ukrayins’kogo Entmologichnogo Tovaristva 1(1): 19-26. Narolsky NB (2001) A review of world species of the genus Eucremastus (Hymenoptera, Ich- neumonidae, Cremastinae). Vestnik Zoologii 35(3): 23-29. Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 391-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev. es.17.110186.002135 Parsons PA (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biological reviews 65: 131-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01186.x Smith DR, Crespi BJ, Bookstein FL (1997) Fluctuating asymmetry in the honey bee, Apis melifera: effects of ploidy and hybridization. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10: 551-574. doi: 10.1007/s000360050041 Townes HK (1969a) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 1. Memoirs of the American Entomo- logical Institute 11: 1-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02027741 Townes HK (1969b) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Memoirs of the American Ento- mological Institute 13: 1-307. Townes HK (1971) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 4. Memoirs of the American Entomo- logical Institute 17: 1-372. Van Halen L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125-142. doi: 10.2307/2406192