-
Opinion 66 Nematode and Gordiacea Names Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 171, Date 1915-02
-
Opinion 67 One hundred and two bird names placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 177, Date 1916-04
-
Opinions Rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature: Opinions 1 to 25
Vol 1, Page 1, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 1 The Meaning of the Word “Indication” in Art. 25a
Vol 1, Page 5, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 2 The Nature of a Systematic Name
Vol 1, Page 5, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 3 The Status of Publications Dated 1758
Vol 1, Page 6, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 4 Status of Certain Names Published as Manuscript Names
Vol 1, Page 6, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 5 Status of Certain Pre-Linnean Names Reprinted Subsequent to 1757
Vol 1, Page 6, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 6 In Case of a Genus A Linnaeus, 1758, with two species, Ab and Ac
Vol 1, Page 7, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 7 On the Interpretation of the Expression "n.g., n.sp." under Article 30(a)
Vol 1, Page 10, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 8 On the Retention of ii or i in Specific Patronymic Names Under Article 14(c) and Article 19
Vol 1, Page 11, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 9 The Use of the Name of a Composite Genus for a Component Part Requiring a Name
Vol 1, Page 13, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 10 Designation of Genotypes for Genera Published with Identical Limits
Vol 1, Page 15, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 11 The Designation of Genotypes by Latreille, 1810
Vol 1, Page 17, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 12 Stephanoceros fimbriatus (Goldfuss, 1820) vs Stephanoceros eichhornii Ehrenberg,1832
Vol 1, Page 19, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 13 The Specific Name of the Sand Crab
Vol 1, Page 22, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 14 The Type Species of Etheostoma Rafinesque, 1819
Vol 1, Page 25, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 15 Craspedacusta sowerbii Lankester, 1880, n.g., n.sp., vs Limnocodium victoria Allman, 1880, n.g., n.sp., a Fresh Water Medusa
Vol 1, Page 28, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 16 The status, under rule (d) in Article 30, of Prebinomial Specific Names (Published Prior to 1758) under Art. 30d
Vol 1, Page 31, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 17 Shall the Genera of Weber, 1795, be Accepted?
Vol 1, Page 40, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 18 The Type of Hydrus Schneider, 1799
Vol 1, Page 43, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 19 Plesiops vs. Pharopteryx
Vol 1, Page 45, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 20 Shall the Genera of Gronow, 1763, be Accepted?
Vol 1, Page 48, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 21 Shall the Genera of Klein, 1744, Reprinted by Walbaum, 1792, Be Accepted ?
Vol 1, Page 51, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 22 Ceraticthys vs. Cliola
Vol 1, Page 53, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 23 Aspro vs. Cheilodipterus, or Ambassis
Vol 1, Page 55, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 24 Antennarius Commerson, 1798, and Duvier, 1817, vs. Histrio Fischer, 1813
Vol 1, Page 57, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 25 Damesiella is une 1899, vs. Damesella Walcott, 1905
Vol 1, Page 59, Date 1910-07
-
Opinion 26 Cypsilurus vs. Cypselurus
Vol 1, Page 63, Date 1910-10
-
Opinion 27 Ruppelia and Rupellia vs. Riippellia
Vol 1, Page 65, Date 1910-10
-
Opinion 28 Shall the Nouvelle Classification of Meigen, 1800, Be Given Precedence Over Meigen's Versuch,1803?
Vol 1, Page 66, Date 1910-10
-
Opinion 29 Pachynathus vs. Pachygnathus
Vol 1, Page 68, Date 1910-10
-
Opinion 30 Swainson’s Bird Genera of 1827
Vol 1, Page 69, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 31 Columbina vs. Chaemepelia
Vol 1, Page 73, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 32 The Type of the Genus Sphex
Vol 1, Page 76, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 33 The Type of the Genus Rafinesque 1820
Vol 1, Page 78, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 34 Aeshna vs. Aeschna
Vol 1, Page 79, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 35 Types of Genera of Binary but not Binominal Authors
Vol 1, Page 82, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 36 Emendation of Trioxocera, Dioxocera, and Pentoxoxera
Vol 1, Page 84, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 37 Shall the Genera of Brisson’s "Ornithologia’’, 1760, Be Accepted?
Vol 1, Page 87, Date 1911-07
-
Opinion 38 On the Status of the Latin Names in Tunstall, 1771
Vol 1, Page 89, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 39 On the Status of the Latin Names in Cuvier, 1800
Vol 1, Page 91, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 40 Salmo eriox vs. S. Trutta and S. fario: Heniochus acuminatus vs. H. macrolepidotus
Vol 1, Page 92, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 41 Athlennes vs. Ablennes
Vol 1, Page 94, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 42 The Type of Carapus Rafinesque, 1810
Vol 1, Page 96, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 43 On the Status of Genera the Type Species of Which are Cited Without Additional Description
Vol 1, Page 97, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 44 Leptocephalus vs. Conger
Vol 1, Page 99, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 45 The Type of Syngnathus Linnaeus, 1758
Vol 1, Page 101, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 46 Status of Genera for which no Species was Distinctly Named in the Original Publication
Vol 1, Page 104, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 47 Carcharias, Carcharhinus and Carcharodon
Vol 1, Page 108, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 48 The Status of Certain Generic Names of Birds Published by Brehm in Isis, 1828 and 1830
Vol 1, Page 110, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 49 Siphonophora asclepiadifolii vs. Nectarophora asclepiadis
Vol 1, Page 112, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 50 Aphis aquilegiae flava vs. Aphis thirhoda
Vol 1, Page 114, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 51 Shall the Names of Museum Calonnianum, 1797, Be Accepted ?
Vol 1, Page 116, Date 1912-02
-
Opinion 52 Semotilus corporalis vs. Semotilus bullaris
Vol 1, Page 119, Date 1913-05
-
Opinion 53 Halicampus koilomatodon vs. Halicampus grayi
Vol 1, Page 122, Date 1913-05
-
Opinion 54 Phoxinus Rafinesque vs. Phoxinus Agassiz
Vol 1, Page 124, Date 1913-05
-
Opinion 55 The Type of the Genus Ondatra Link
Vol 1, Page 126, Date 1913-05
-
Opinion 56 The Type of Filaria Mueller, 1787
Vol 1, Page 128, Date 1913-05
-
Opinion 57 Names Dating from Hasselquist’s “Iter Palaestinum", 1757, and the Translation, 1762, are Untenable
Vol 1, Page 131, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 58 Esox, Lucius, and Belone
Vol 1, Page 135, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 59 Date of Amphimerus
Vol 1, Page 140, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 60 Salmo iridia vs. Salmo irideus
Vol 1, Page 144, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 61 Emendation of Chaemepeliato Chamaepelia
Vol 1, Page 145, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 62 Type Species of Other Genera are not Excluded from Consideration in the Selection of the Type of a Genus
Vol 1, Page 147, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 63 Leuciscus hakuensis vs. Leuciscus hakonensis
Vol 1, Page 150, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 64 Serial Letters as a, b, c, etc., are not Acceptable as Specific Names
Vol 1, Page 151, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 65 Case of a Genus Based upon Erroneously Determined Species
Vol 1, Page 152, Date 1914-03
-
Opinion 68 The Type Species of Pleuronectes Linnaeus, 1758
Vol 1, Page 185, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 69 The Type Species of Sparus Linnaeus, 1758
Vol 1, Page 193, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 70 The Case of Libellula americana L., 1758, vs. Libellula americanus Drury, 1773
Vol 1, Page 197, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 71 Interpretation of the Expression "Typical Species" in Westwood’s (1840) Synopsis
Vol 1, Page 200, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 72 Herrera’s Zoological Formulae
Vol 1, Page 203, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 73 Five Generic Names in Crinoidea, Eighty-Six Generic Names in Crustacea, and Eight Generic Names in Acarina, Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 207, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 74 Apstein's (1915) List of Nomina Conservanda
Vol 1, Page 216, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 75 Twenty-seven Generic Names of Protozoa, Vermes, Pisces, Reptilia, and Mammalia Included in the Official List of Zoological Names
Vol 1, Page 219, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 76 Status of Pyrosoma vs. Monophora ; Cyclosalpa vs. Holothuria ; Salpa vs. Dagysa; Doliolum, Appendicularia and Fritillaria
Vol 1, Page 222, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 77 Thirty-five Generic Names in Protozoa, Coelenterata, Trematoda, Cestoda, Cirripedia, Tunicata, and Pisces Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 255, Date 1922-01-31
-
Opinion 78 Case of Dermacentor andersoni vs. Dermacentor venustus
Vol 1, Page 261, Date 1924-02-09
-
Opinion 79 Case of Lamarck’s (1801a) Système des Animaux sans Vertèbres
Vol 1, Page 275, Date 1924-02-09
-
Opinion 80 Suspension of Rules in the Case of Holothuria and Physalia
Vol 1, Page 277, Date 1924-02-09
-
Opinion 81 The Genotype of Cimex, Acanthia, Clinocoris, and Klinophilos
Vol 1, Page 279, Date 1924-02-09
-
Opinion 82 Suspension of the Rules for Musca Linnaeus, 1758a, type M. domestica
Vol 1, Page 295, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 83 Acanthiza pyrrhopygia Vigors and Horsfield, 1827, vs. Acanthiza pyrrhopygia Gould, 1848
Vol 1, Page 302, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 84 ‘Trematode, Cestode, and Acanthocephala Names Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 305, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 85 Ninety-eight Generic Names in Crustacea placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 307, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 86 Conulinus von Martens, 1895
Vol 1, Page 313, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 87 The Status of Proof-Sheets in Nomenclature
Vol 1, Page 315, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 88 Otarion diffractum vs. Cyphaspis Burmeisteri
Vol 1, Page 317, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 89 Suspension of the Rules in the Case of Gronow, 1763, Commerson, 1803, Gesellschaft Schauplatz, 1775 to 1781, Catesby, 1771, Browne, 1789, Valmont de Bomare, 1768 to 1775
Vol 1, Page 321, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 90 Report on Sixteen Generic Names of Mammals for Which Suspension of Rules was Requested
Vol 1, Page 328, Date 1925-12-16
-
Opinion 91 Thirty-five Generic Names of Mammals Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 337, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 92 Sixteen Generic Names of Pisces, Amphibia and Reptilia Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 339, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 93 Twelve Generic Names of Fishes Placed in the Official List, by Suspension of the Rules
Vol 1, Page 341, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 94 Twenty-two Mollusk and Tunicate Names Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 348, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 95 Two Generic Names of Protozoa Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 350, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 96 Museum Boltenianum
Vol 1, Page 352, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 97 Did Hübner’s Tentamen, 1806, Create Monotypic Genera ?
Vol 1, Page 355, Date 1926-10-08
-
Opinion 98 Brauer and Bergenstamm
Vol 1, Page 369, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 99 Endamoeba Leidy, 1879, vs. Entamoeba Casagrandi and Barbagallo, 1895
Vol 1, Page 372, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 100 Suspension of the Rules, Spirifer and Syringothyris
Vol 1, Page 377, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 101 Nomenclatorial Status of Danilewsky, "Contribution à l'Étude de la Microbiose Malarique" in Annales de l'Institut Pasteur, 1891, Vol. 5, pages 758—782
Vol 1, Page 381, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 102 Proteocephala Blainville, 1828, vs. Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858
Vol 1, Page 384, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 103 The Generic Name Grus, Type Ardea grus
Vol 1, Page 389, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 104 Generic Names Placed in the Official List
Vol 1, Page 393, Date 1928-09-19
-
Opinion 105 Dybowski’s (1926) Names of Crustacea Suppressed
Vol 1, Page 399, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 106 The Type of Oestrus Linn., 1758, is O. ovis
Vol 1, Page 402, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 107 Echinocyamus pusillus vs. Echinocyamus minutus
Vol 1, Page 407, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 108 Suspension of Rules for Gazella, 1816
Vol 1, Page 413, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 109 Suspension of Rules for Hippotragus, 1846
Vol 1, Page 414, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 110 Suspension of Rules for Lagidium, 1833
Vol 1, Page 415, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 111 Suspension of Rules for Nycteris
Vol 1, Page 416, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 112 Suspension Declined for Manatus, 1772 vs. Trichechus, 1758
Vol 1, Page 417, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 113 Sarcopes Latreille, 1802, Type scabiei, Placed on Official List
Vol 1, Page 418, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 114 Under Suspension Simia, Simia satyrus, and Pithecus Are Suppressed
Vol 1, Page 423, Date 1929-06-08
-
Opinion 115 Status of Leucochilus
Vol 1, Page 427, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 116 Bulimus Scopoli, 1777, vs. Bulinus Mueller, 1781, vs. Bulimus Bruguière, 1792
Vol 1, Page 432, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 117 Type of Lithostrotion
Vol 1, Page 444, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 118 Scalpellum gabbi Wade, 1926, a Nomen Nudum
Vol 1, Page 446, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 119 Six Molluscan Generic Names Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 449, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 120 The Status of Achatinus, 1810
Vol 1, Page 455, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 121 Necessity for Suspension of Rules in Case of Agasoma Gabb, 1869, Type Sinuatum, Not Proved
Vol 1, Page 457, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 122 Seven Generic Names in Primates Adopted in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 459, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 123 P. F. Gmelin’s Onomatologia Historiae Naturalis Completa Suppressed
Vol 1, Page 460, Date 1931-01-10
-
Opinion 124 Linnaeus, 1758, Subdivisions of Genera
Vol 1, Page 465, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 125 Boros Herbst, 1797, and Borus Agassiz, 1846, vs. Borus Albers, 1850
Vol 1, Page 467, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 126 New Names in d’Orbigny’s, 1850, "Prodrome” Are Nomenclatorially Available
Vol 1, Page 469, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 127 Suspension of Rules for Lepidocyclina Gümbel, 1868, Type Nummulites mantelli
Vol 1, Page 487, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 128 Nycteribia, 1796, Pupipara, and Spinturnix, 1826, Acarine
Vol 1, Page 493, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 129 Bipinnaria 1835 vs. Luidia 1839
Vol 1, Page 496, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 130 Lytoceras Suess, 1865, Placed in the Official List of Generic Names
Vol 1, Page 498, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 131 The Type Species of Tromikosoma Mortensen, 1903
Vol 1, Page 501, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 132 Status of the "Gattungsbezeichnungen" of Sobolew, 1914
Vol 1, Page 503, Date 1936-10-28
-
Opinion 133 Urothoe Dana and PHOXOCEPHALIDAE Sars
Vol 1, Page 505, Date 1936-10-28
-
Foreword
Vol 1, Page III, Date 1958-07-01