⇑lines 14—10 score
⇑line 11 underline "Uebereinkunft"
⇑lines 13—1 annotation great agreemt in animals & Plants in Bastardsng
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 21 score "XVII" in pale pencil
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 15 annotation Compounded
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 15 underline "Vereinigung"
line 15 annotation joining
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 12—14 score in pale pencil
lines 12—17 annotation cause of failure chiefly in female. organs.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 7 underline in pale pencil "umständlicher"
⇑line 7 annotation circumstantial
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 5 underline "Wesen" @5 annotation existence
line 10 underline "vollkommenen"
line 10 annotation perfect
⇑line 5 underline "zeugen"
⇑line 5 annotation witness.
⇑line 3 underline "Verkümmerung"
⇑line 3 annotation arresting
⇑line 3 underline "Staubgefässe"
⇑line 3 annotation anthers
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 3 underline "Verletzungen"
line 3 annotation wounds
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 1 underline "Täuschung"
bottom-margin annotation illusion
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 9 underline "kehren"
line 9 annotation return
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 5 underline "Zeitraum"
line 5 annotation period
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 17—21 annotation fruit falls off, from an imperfect impregnation
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 6 underline in pale pencil "Vertheilung"
line 6 annotation distribution
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 7 underline "fremden"
line 7 annotation Never the least effect .
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 11 underline "erfordert"
line 11 annotation requires
⇑line 10 underline "Beziehung"
⇑line 10 annotation reference
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 5—6 multiple score
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 10 underline "dreifach ... gemischten"
lines 8—10 annotation 3 — sorts in same capsules
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 7 underline "fülich"
⇑line 7 annotation convenient
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 underline "fleissigen"
line 2 annotation diligent
line 5 underline "zuverlässig"
line 5 annotation authentic
line 9 underline "Andeutung"
line 9 annotation notice
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
bottom-margin annotation see p. 499 . & p 135
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 8 score [`bookmark']
⇑line 10 score [`bookmark']
line 3 underline "angemessen"
line 3 annotation suitable
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 2—4 score
lines 3—5 score
top-margin annotation ⧟ The capability of hybrid‹isation› fructification ‹occur› lies in more special character, than those characterising any whole family
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 13 score [`bookmark']
line 12 at "Einreden" annotation objections
line 12 at "veranlasst" annotation caused —
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 8 score [`bookmark']
⇑line 3 crossing-out "8"
⇑line 3 annotation 137
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 17 underline "obgewalten" annotation exist
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 9 at "Abkunft" annotation [illegible word]
line 9 at "vereinigt" annotation [?]fixed
line 12 at "eingewendet" annotation opposed
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 at "anerkannt" annotation acknowledged
line 6 at "stete" annotation fixed
⇑line 7 at "eingeprägte" annotation inculcated
⇑line 6 underline "vertilgbar" annotation exterminate
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 18 at "Lücke" annotation gap
⇑line 5 at "Huldigen" annotation do homage
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 12 at "Beurtheilung" annotation judgmnt
⇑line 11 at "Vertheidiger" annotation defender
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 15 at "naturgemässen Verhältinssen" annotation conformable to nature relations
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 1 at "Gegenstand" annotation resistance
⇑line 8 at "Anspruch" annotation lay claim to
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 17 at "vorgeblichen" annotation pretended
⇑line 9 at "Ermittelung" annotation enquiry
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
top-margin annotation horizontally crossed || officinalis & acaulis not in Loudon.— p 721 officinalis = veris = Cowslip — I see it is barely possible without consultng Babington to know which is which
from Slip Attached 2, Side 1 annotation (For p. 178)t01
1. P. acaulis P. vulgaris. Primrose. a speciest02
2 P. elatior (calycantha)
3 P. elatior (communis) — — P. elatior. Oxlip, true plant. a speciest03
4 P. veris (officinalis) — — P. veris. Cowslip. — — a speciest04
5 P. veris (officinalis) calycantha
6 P. calycantha (elatior)
N.B. in Nr 3. “communis” sometime in Bracket, sometimes not.—
No ■5. I presume must be some blunder of Printers
No 6. ■ Can these names have been reversed by Printer
t01 - `(For p. 178)' in pencil
t02 - `P. vulgaris ... species' not in Darwin's hand
t03 - `— — P. elatior ... species' not in Darwin's hand
t04 - `— — P. veris ... species' not in Darwin's hand
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 3 underline "officinalis"
line 3 annotation cowslip
line 3 at "elatior" annotation oxlip
line 4 underline "acaulis"
line 4 annotation primrose
top-margin—line 3 annotation x----(Q)
top-margin—line 8 annotation /Most important
on Babington's authority see Table
top-margin annotation Here are vars ,which will not unite
from Slip Attached 2, Side 1 annotation (For p. 178)t01
1. P. acaulis P. vulgaris. Primrose. a speciest02
2 P. elatior (calycantha)
3 P. elatior (communis) — — P. elatior. Oxlip, true plant. a speciest03
4 P. veris (officinalis) — — P. veris. Cowslip. — — a speciest04
5 P. veris (officinalis) calycantha
6 P. calycantha (elatior)
N.B. in Nr 3. “communis” sometime in Bracket, sometimes not.—
No ■5. I presume must be some blunder of Printers
No 6. ■ Can these names have been reversed by Printer
t01 - `(For p. 178)' in pencil
t02 - `P. vulgaris ... species' not in Darwin's hand
t03 - `— — P. elatior ... species' not in Darwin's hand
t04 - `— — P. veris ... species' not in Darwin's hand
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 4—9 score
lines 4—8 annotation cancelled Converse of these very difficult
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 10—14 score in dark pencil
lines 10—12 score
lines 13—14 score
lines 11—16 annotation in dark pencil very different in Habit, yet unite easily.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 6—5 score [`bookmark']
⇑line 7 at "grellen " annotation distinct
⇑line 6 at "enthalten" annotation contain
⇑line 2 at "beiträgt" annotation contribute
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
top-margin annotation ☞ (Bad simile) We might as well as deny that th different «substances»t01 were really different, because thy had no “elective affinity” «(I use word of Gärtner)» t02 whereas other two had strng elective affinity & wd. unite & make a third. —
t01 - `substances' in dark pencil
t02 - `« (I use ... Gärtner)» ' in dark pencil
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 4 annotation («sexual» non-reciprocity) of th “elective-affinity”.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 8—12 score in pale pencil
lines 7—9 annotation (z)→
top-margin annotation (z) || The absence of perfect reciprocity even in nearly related species, shows that male & female power of union do not go together : but this difference of male & female has no effect on th Hybrid offspring
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 X [`bookmark']
lines 13—22 score
lines 13—22 annotation in wild Plants nmber of seeds do not differ so greatly as to cause much difficulty in estimatng numbers.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 4—2 ]
⇑line 6—bottom-margin annotation There are ‹are› differncs in flowers of same plant in being impregnated by foreign pollen.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 14 double score [`bookmark']
⇑line 8 at "vermeiden" annotation avoid
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 14 score [`bookmark']
⇑lines 16—12 score
⇑lines 17—10 annotation Double flower raised from male or female
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 4—9 score
line 4 annotation a
top-margin annotation Differs from animals for sex no effect on Hybrids
lines 11—14 score
lines 12—13 annotation see to this
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 10—11 score
lines 8—14 annotation The normal Hybrid type keeps constant in succeeding generations only in the most fertile hybrids, generally.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 11—15 annotation In abnormal types like both parents but most like one.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 at "wankend" annotation staggering
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 11 at "fügt" annotation adds
⇑line 6 underline "Räthselhaftes" annotation emigma
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 20—25 annotation ‹generally› «not seldom» in Hybrids one side «or species—» prevails over other; & this prevailing is not accidental but is constant.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 3 score [`bookmark']
⇑lines 17—11 annotation in Plants neither father or mother has exclusive influence
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 12 score [`bookmark']
lines 1—3 unmarked
top-margin annotation In Hybrids, form of the cotyledons affected
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 5—9 annotation some ‹are› «exceptional types» come into this class.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 1—2 score
top-margin annotation Even in th mixed types , one part now resembles one parent , now another part the other parent. —
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 19 score
⇑lines 17—12 annotation Colour variable often, in crosses & unexpected
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 10 score
⇑lines 9—7 score
⇑line 8 annotation (a)
bottom-margin annotation White flowers commoner here than more South.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 15 crossing-out "phoeniceum"
⇑line 13 annotation purpurea
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 3 score [`bookmark']
⇑lines 9—7 score
⇑line 8 annotation (a)
bottom-margin annotation (a) Hybrids are affected especially in male organs, with exceptions .
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 14—16 score
lines 22—24 score
lines 13—28 annotation even in most fruitful hybrids normal number of seeds never produced & always mingled with bad ones.
compares this fact to result of Hybrid fructifications.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 14 score
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 19 score [`bookmark']
⇑lines 6—4 score
⇑lines 7—5 underline "dass ... vermögen"
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 10—15 score
line 12 annotation a
top-margin annotation (a) insists male organs more & earlier affected in Hybrids than female .
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 8—13 score
line 13 underline "wie ... hat"
line 13 annotation !
line 10 annotation (a)
top-margin annotation (a) says much experience has shown him that Hybrids, after ‹many› «lines 8—10» generations, have their procreative powers weaker & weaker; & hence cannot be prolonged.— (But then ‹almo› all crossing avoided.—)
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 4 score [`bookmark']
line 2 underline "eigenen"
lines 5—10 score in pale pencil
line 7 annotation (a)
top-margin annotation ⸮ In Hybrids crossed with either parent , & thus assuming fertility & th ancestral form , yet fertility variable in «such» individuals; in th successive generations.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 4—6 score
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 2—1 underline "zusammengesetzten ... unfruchtbar"
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 10 at "gesteigerte" annotation enhanced
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 16—4 score
⇑line 9 at "entschiedene" annotation decided
bottom-margin annotation I believe he here argues that going back of Hybrid offspring, & «of» t01 varieties «not crssd» t02 , is evidence of aboriginal foundation form of species.
☞ So it is some evidence —[continues on page 441]— V. p. 455 my Note .Good.
t01 - `« of» ' in dark pencil
t02 - `« not crssd» ' in dark pencil
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 6 at "geläugnet" annotation denied
lines 6—9 annotation all the above facts like Avatismus in animals.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 10—20 annotation The more fruitful stick to the hybrid type longer than the less fruitful. Rate of going back varies according to Kind
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 8 underline "zur Stammmutter"
lines 7—18 annotation The law that these (I fancy both paternal & maternal, anyhow the latter) of themselves, self-impregnated go back to type of Mother, most important. (t01 A )t02
top-margin—line 5 annotation (A) This makes me believe th reported fact that Mongrels go back: Bell insisted on this to me one day , in regard to Pigeons, & I think Dixon did.
☞ So Gaertners remark that this proof of Real Species fails, for applicable to Varieties
lines 1—16 annotation → (But it might be said that one var. was an ursprungliche forme.—)
top-margin annotation in dark pencil Neither var. shd be an aboriginal form.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 8—7 annotation The metamorphosis of one Species into another like a variety into another seems opposed to species being something distinct as Entity.— XX
bottom-margin annotation XX It is argued that th sterility of hybrids , shows that species are a distinct entity, then surely the points in which they agree, may be fairly adduced to show that thy are not essentially different
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 6—5 annotation Mr Tollets case of Malay Fowls so long affecting breed is case of a var. with strnger tendeny than othrs to go back, like species
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 10 at "Tadel" annotation blame
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 7—4 multiple score cancelled
⇑lines 6—5 annotation (a)
bottom-margin annotation |||t01 (a) The «rate of» metamorphosis depends chiefly on th species employed; but also in less degree on the variety [This rate has narrow limit.] of the individuals employed; on account of different degree which thy go back in type
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 10 at "übersteigen" annotation exceed
⇑line 7 at "Ziel" annotation limit
⇑lines 13—7 annotation As far as yet known never requires more than 6 or 7 generations
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 6 double score in pale pencil [`bookmark']
[continuation] ⇑lines 14—6 score
⇑lines 12—9 annotation Examples of last Rule
⇑lines 3—1 annotation Exceptions to
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 11—15 score
lines 12—13 annotation (B)
top-margin annotation (B) Returns to parent-forms throgh self impregnation are very slow, & require mny generations .
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 23 double score [`bookmark']
line 8 at "vorgeblichen" annotation pretended
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 7 double score
⇑lines 6—5 annotation (A)
bottom-margin annotation (A) In this second subclass, species are used which will not cross without the intermediate & 3d species, & therefore are very little allied in sexual affinity.— These always most closely resemble pure father. Excessively sterile
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 19—11 annotation cancelled It seems that where pollen pure & ovules hybrid, then appr [ie `approaches'?] to pure & less variability
⇑lines 9—4 score
⇑lines 8—6 score in dark pencil
bottom-margin annotation not so variable, apparently owig t th potency of effect of pure parent.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 1—6 score
lines 2—4 annotation (A)
line 5 at "überwiegenden" annotation prepondertng
line 6 double score
top-margin annotation A. Conclusions (1) that hybrid ovules or pollen cause of variability.
(2) that th pollen, even of hybrid origin has preponderatng influenc over femal !!! I do not see how this second conclusn
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 1 underline cancelled "keimten ... früher"
lines 18—20 score
line 18 underline "11 ... Bastardarten"
lines 18—19 annotation X
lines 1—18 annotation cancelled Period of germination in Hybrid seeds vry various
from Front Slip annotation p. 521 to p. 524 on germination of Hybrid seed. & all seeds.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 4—10 annotation Hybrids flower earlier ,with exceptions
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 20—15 score
⇑lines 20—5 annotation Never gives so many seeds as pure parent. /
As pure species are often sterile sterility cannot be taken as proof of hybridsm
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 1—6 score
top-margin annotation can offer no explanation of Sterility
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 6 apparently unintentional mark
line 18 double score in pale pencil [`bookmark']
lines 1—4 score
line 1 underline "Cucurbitaceen"
lines 2—3 annotation (B)
top-margin annotation In Cucurbitae, on sam plant often two kinds of fruit in shape & flavor
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 6 at "beurkundet" annotation reported
line 6 at "unausgesetzte" annotation continual
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 7—8 underline "Gewöhnlich ... vermittelt"
lines 7—8 annotation Important ----- intermediate & this is commonest in close species see p. 283
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 13 underline "früher"
line 16 double score
lines 9—20 annotation The uninjured & often increased fertility of mongrels, accounted for by luxuriance of Hybrids (I do not see this) & says he find garden Plants varied from crossing vars. are earlier than ordinary vegetables. (The earliness is hardly same as greater fertility.) (⸮) (ask)
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 11, ⇑10, ⇑9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 2, 1 ✔
⇑11— annotation on account of greater «but not equal to pure species» fertility Kolreuter considered these as only vars: ‹vars.› — G. thinks «(from actual experiments)» «‹frm exprmnts›» only th Hyosciamus as true varieties; because by cultivation one turned into other
(Steudel makes agrestis a Synony of H. niger G. says thy turned into each other)
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
subjects
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 15 score [`bookmark']
lines 4—7 annotation The smaller proportion of Hybrids are “intermediate”
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 14—12 score
⇑lines 16—9 annotation speaks of law of both organs being ready at same time !
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 at "Wimmer" annotation ∗ 15/ all follwg numbers wrong
⇑line 10 crossing-out "25" annotation in dark pencil 26 /
bottom-margin annotation see Corrigenda
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 16 crossing-out "53"
line 16 annotation 54 /
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 8—10 score
lines 8—10 annotation The inner nature of Plants cannot be judged frm outside. —
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 8—1 score
⇑line 5 annotation (a)
bottom-margin annotation Points in which grafted Plants do differ from same raised by seed
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 5—9 annotation Even th wood keeps distnct at place of grafting.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 2—8 score
top-margin annotation The relation of th different kinds which can be grafted on same stock is vry different from the relationship on which hybridisation depends
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 8 double score [`bookmark']
line 11 crossing-out "70"
line 11 annotation 71 /
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
bottom-margin apparently unintentional mark
⇑line 4 double score [`bookmark']
⇑lines 8—7 score
⇑lines 8—7 underline "Unkenntnis ... Gewächsen"
bottom-margin annotation Ignorance of process of fructification in some plants has caused ‹m› failures
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 16 annotation Pincers
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 14—18 annotation cut with scissors or pull off stamens, not touch anthers
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 1—5 score
top-margin annotation Cultivated in Pots so thus excluded from cross impregnation
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 9—2 score
⇑line 9—bottom-margin annotation The artificial impreg of mny flowers on same plant injurious to it.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
lines 2—10 score
line 6 annotation (a)
top-margin annotation (a) The impregnation with own pollen, ‹fructi› fertility always greater than in any Hybrid, & equal or at least near natural fertility, but sometimes less.— Really this accounts for th (i a) of Hybrids.—
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 10 double score [`bookmark']
lines 11—15 annotation Plants to be fertilised in chamber facng S.E.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 1 crossing-out "56"
line 1 annotation 57
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 14 crossing-out "65"
line 14 annotation 6
line 18 crossing-out "66"
line 18 annotation 7
line 19 crossing-out "67"
line 19 annotation 8
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 3 double score [`bookmark']
line 18 crossing-out "68"
line 18 annotation 9
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑lines 18—15 annotation fertility varies much in differnt experimnts.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
line 2 score in reddish-orange crayon
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 23 annotation 253
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts
⇑line 26 underline "Wahlverwandtschaft"
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ “Elective affinity” Chemical term Dict.
![hide subjects](../Images/bib_minus.gif)
concepts