dcsimg
Please read BHL's Acknowledgment of Harmful Content
All titles related to this item Philosophie zoologique. vol. 1
Close Dialog

Text Sources

Page text in BHL originates from one of the following sources:
Uncorrected OCR Machine-generated text. May include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Error-corrected OCR Machine-generated, machine-corrected text. Better quality than Uncorrected OCR, but may still include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Manual Transcription Human-created and reviewed text. For issues concerning manual transcription text, please contact the original holding institution.
  • Pages
  • Table of Contents
Show More
Page Link
Scientific Names on this Page

Indexed by Global Names
Book Title
Philosophie zoologique. vol. 1
By
Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste-Pierre-Antoine de Monet de 1744-1829
Publication Details
Paris, Duminil-Lesueur, 1830 (1830 re-issue of the 1809 edition)
Year
1830
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50194
Holding Institution
Cambridge University Library
Sponsor
JISC & NEH
Copyright & Usage
Rights:
Darwin Estate and Cambridge University Library

Copyright Status:
In copyright


Search Inside This Book:
Results For:
Click/Shift+Click pages to select for download
Cancel Generate Review No Pages Added
Close Dialog Finish Review My PDF

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive the latest BHL news, content highlights, and promotions.

Subscribe

Help Support BHL

BHL relies on donations to provide free PDF downloads and other services. Help keep BHL free and open!

Donate

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

  
Optional
Example: Charles Darwin, Carl Linnaeus
Example: Birds, Classification, Mammals
Contributed by Cambridge University Library
Annotation Not Available
Page 21
⇑lines 10—4 score
⇑lines 8—7 underline "ni ... familles"
Page 22
⇑lines 15—11 score
⇑lines 10—8 score
Page 25
⇑lines 5—1 double score
Page 26
lines 8—12 score
line 9 annotation Why ? ⧟
⇑lines 8—7 underline "ou ... existé"
⇑lines 8—7 annotation X
bottom-margin annotation Fallacy common to Swainson & Macleay
Page 31
lines 12—14 double score
⇑lines 8—3 double score in dark pencil
⇑lines 6—5 annotation X
bottom-margin annotation X Here seems to think existing series perfect
Page 32
⇑lines 11—9 score
Page 33
⇑lines 3—1 score
⇑lines 2—1 annotation ?
bottom-margin annotation V. p 31
Page 38
bottom-margin annotation In this Chapter argues that all divisions «or gaps» are artificial & that the series is either now perfect or has been so —
     — Fallacy —
Page 39
lines 9—12 double score
line 11 underline "parenté"
Page 44
in dark pencil
lines 10—13 score
lines 10—13 annotation why so strong a division?
from End Slip annotation 44    It is odd that in animals organs for conservation of life important , in plants organs of reproduction — But a flower is more than organ.
Page 50
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 5—1 score
⇑lines 4—3 annotation ⸮
Page 51
[continuation] 1—12 score
Page 52
bottom-margin annotation On the importance of relations .
Page 55
in dark pencil
lines 11—25 score
Page 56
⇑lines 15—4 score
Page 57
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 7—4 double score
⇑line 1 score
bottom-margin annotation Lower animals where many species /
Page 58
[continuation] 1—9 score
from End Slip annotation 58 . good remarks how arbitray th distinction between race & species is.
⇑lines 11—1 score
Page 59
⇑lines 13—12 score
⇑line 13 underline "forment ... rameuse"
⇑lines 11—4 score
Page 62
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 8—1 score
⇑lines 4—2 annotation ⸮
bottom-margin annotation Is there any marked difference between races produced in same or different countries, with respect to propagation ?
from End Slip annotation 62    alludes to conditions.
     [In Preface ask whether from earliest ‹day› «age» there can have been revolution of climate corresponding t th mny changes in organisms on earths face.]
Page 63
[continuation] 1—5 double score cancelled
lines 2—4 annotation ?
Page 64
⇑lines 8—4 score
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ ‹wh› a want of Proof
Page 68
top-margin—line 12 annotation One case of acquired heredetary instincts, shows that instincts can be acquired.
lines 10—19 score
lines 8—11 ⧟
line 11 at "tout" annotation ⧟
line 8 underline "sublime Auteur"
line 21 underline "nature"
Page 70
⇑lines 8—2 score
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ & not isolated pair
Page 71
lines 1—4 score
annotation ??
show subjects subjects
lines 13—15 score
lines 13—15 annotation ! Well-said
⇑lines 11—8 score
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ Like Lyell in Geology
show subjects concepts
Page 75
lines 1—7 score
lines 10—14 score
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ not well stated
Page 76
lines 1—25 score in pale pencil
show subjects subjects
lines 10—23 score
lines 14—18 score
lines 14—16 annotation poor
line 13 underline "à détruire"
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ S. Africa
Page 78
lines 1—26 annotation in pale pencil The similarity of type on old Continents & in oldest seas .— does it point to first Creation ??
show subjects subjects
bottom-margin annotation / Lamarck argues, species of shells, not killed by man, no apparent cause of death ; but causes of change are present ∴ therfor fossil same species with modern.—
Page 79
lines 13—15 double score
⇑lines 6—1 annotation (=> rate of change not uniform in world, except on great scale)
show subjects concepts
bottom-margin annotation Geologists judge of time by change of species, these changes effect of physical changes (dynamical changes). these we can only judge of by present day — Therefore measure of past ages is reduced to observation of changes at present day .—
Page 80
bottom-margin annotation Therfor every fossil species direct father of existing analogues & no extinction except through man!— [Hence cause of innumerable errors in Lamarck]
Page 81
bottom-margin annotation in pale pencil { There is nothing about types as Geograph. Grouping
bottom-margin annotation / On Species— argues against permanence, when conditions changing — series branching, now or once perfect.— no genera — conditions change species, & these changes by time become fixed — «assumes» some near species made by (p. 64) by hybridity & fixed by time — wants produce habitudes th source of actions, faculties & instincts — argues against Egypt case & asks what is 2000 to 3000 years? — / definition of species 75 /— doubts any extinct animals ! (hence theory must be false XX
show subjects subjects
Page 83
in pale pencil
lines 9—15 score
lines 10—11 underline "n'offrant ... parfait"
lines 10—12 annotation ??
bottom-margin annotation nearly all compound animals being fixed, analogy with vegetables ,— caused probably by ‹non› imperfect transmission of will preventing voluntary & coinstantaneous movements.
Page 84
in pale pencil
lines 1—4 multiple score
annotation ⸮
Page 86
lines 1—4 double score
Page 89
⇑lines 12—6 score
⇑lines 11—8 annotation ?
Page 93
lines 1—5 double score
show subjects subjects
Page 101
bottom-margin annotation Speculations .
Page 105
lines 11—14 double score
from Page0129 annotation — Classification —
     p. 105. few animals at the limits of classes — animals in series & not ramified? «& p. 109» (quite different from my view) — organs vary in developement. & not in. same ratio, as th developement of th class to which it belongs
⇑lines 5—2 double score in pale pencil
from Page0129 annotation — Classification —
     p. 105. few animals at the limits of classes — animals in series & not ramified? «& p. 109» (quite different from my view) — organs vary in developement. & not in. same ratio, as th developement of th class to which it belongs
Page 106
⇑lines 11—1 score
Page 107
⇑lines 14—2 score
⇑line 12 underline "que ... la"
Page 108
lines 13—22 score
Page 109
lines 9—16 multiple score
from Page0129 annotation — Classification —
     p. 105. few animals at the limits of classes — animals in series & not ramified? «& p. 109» (quite different from my view) — organs vary in developement. & not in. same ratio, as th developement of th class to which it belongs
Page 110
⇑lines 5—1 double score
Page 127
⇑lines 12—4 double score
show subjects subjects
Page 129
bottom-margin annotation — Classification —
     p. 105. few animals at the limits of classes — animals in series & not ramified? «& p. 109» (quite different from my view) — organs vary in developement. & not in. same ratio, as th developement of th class to which it belongs
Page 134
in pale pencil
[continues overleaf] ⇑1 score
Page 135
in pale pencil
[continuation] 1—3 score
Page 136
lines 1—6 double score
Page 140
⇑line 1 underline "les ... La"
whole-margin annotation There appears to me to be some confusion in these ideas of degradation. What make perfection, except «that» towars the end wanted. Look at Struct of Crustacea
     Scale (of many kinds) of complication exists.
Page 144
in mid-grey ink
lines 1—3 score
Page 145
lines 6—14 score
line 13—bottom-margin annotation — Here is the difference between Lamarck & Me
Page 146
lines 5—8 score
lines 6—8 annotation ⸮
Page 147
lines 1—2 double score
Page 148
lines 3—8 score
bottom-margin annotation The « economy of» t01 world could have gone on without Bats or Ostriches.— It can only be following out some great principle
     It is clear Birds made preeminent for air. yet if no birds: Mammalia would hav tak place [continues on page 149] ---- There limit to this Adaptation. Fish could hardly have lived out of water. Though Crabs — Spiders under water.—
t01 - `economy of' in dark brown inkoverwritein pencil
show subjects concepts
Page 150
lines 1—4 double score
lines 1—3 annotation ⸮
top-margin—line 6 annotation This is rather false : Simply to differ from highst animal, does not prove degradation . Who can doubt superiority of some organs & therfor senses in low animals /
⇑lines 14—1 score
⇑line 14 underline "palmipèdes"
⇑line 13 underline "avantage"
⇑line 13 annotation ? Why
⇑lines 14—11 ⧟
⇑line 11 underline "sortant ... marcher"
⇑lines 14—4 annotation How curiously different from Swainson
Page 151
lines 6—10 score
lines 6—10 annotation as bad as Swainson
Page 155
lines 13—15 annotation { no links with high classes
Page 156
lines 15—16 score
bottom-margin annotation cancelled according to his class of argument. This not degradation because mere effect of in
show subjects subjects
Page 157
lines 5—10 score
show subjects subjects
bottom-margin annotation NB. Snakes perform the parts of fish, & fish of snakes. —
show subjects subjects
Page 158
line 7 underline "odorat"
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ On this scheme of organization «lower down» it would not be expected to find ‹organs› smell more perfect . But in others as articulates it is much more perfect
Page 217
bottom-margin annotation in brown ink This chapter must be looked over again: L. distinguishes between degraded or abortive organs, such as extremities of Cetacea &c & less developed forms — : discussion on this point fills much of this chapt.
bottom-margin annotation The want of progression in the vegetable world serious fact Lamarck has rather overlooked . — Though no doubt vegetable world should rather be considered as one family (not so large as insects) in the scheme of organic beings.
show subjects subjects
Page 221
⇑lines 6—1 score
Page 223
in pale pencil
lines 14—21 score
lines 14—18 annotation Therefore not same thery to plants & animals
Page 229
in dark pencil
⇑lines 5—1 score
⇑line 1 underline "formées ... pays"
⇑lines 2—1 annotation ?
show subjects subjects
Page 235
in dark pencil
lines 16—18 score
lines 17—22 annotation are there any facts? I doubt
Page 241
lines 3—8 score
lines 13—16 annotation in brown ink Australia hony-sucking Marsupial.
Page 242
top-margin annotation Coleoptera wings beneath soldered cases
show subjects subjects
lines 1—6 double score
lines 1—3 annotation Mem. Tucotucu
show subjects subjects
Page 244
lines 8—13 score
lines 9—11 annotation ⸮
show subjects subjects
Page 246
lines 5—13 score
Page 261
[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 7—1 score
from End Note annotation in dark pencil / p 261
     On effects of intermarriage in preventing multiplication of species /
Page 262
[continuation] 1—7 score
Page 266
lines 7—14 score
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ Does not pursue this into Geographical Distribution
Page 267
lines 7—16 score
⇑lines 11—1 score
Page 268
in pale pencil
bottom-margin annotation Explains how animals & plants change — Lamarck'st01 theory differs for plants & animals — It is absurd the way , he assumes th want of habit cause annihilation of organ and vice versâ —
     ||t02 Explains how crossing presents innumerable varieties of man — & supposes if no distance between men, there would not be many races of man — does not extend this view
t01 - `Lamarck's' in brown inkoverwritein pale pencil
t02 - `||' in dark pencil
Page 376
in pale pencil
lines 1—3 double score
lines 1—13 annotation This shows connection of life with laws of Attraction
line 16—bottom-margin annotation / If food in stomach is vitalized one need not wonder at the power of the Womb
Page 378
in pale pencil
lines 10—18 score
lines 12—13 annotation crystal
show subjects concepts
Page 379
in pale pencil
⇑lines 10—4 score
⇑lines 8—6 annotation ?
Page 380
in pale pencil
lines 1—7 score
lines 3—5 annotation ⸮
show subjects concepts
Page 381
in pale pencil
lines 1—3 double score
lines 4—14 score
top-margin annotation Have not crystals certain properties common to the whole & not to part ? ⧟
Page 382
in pale pencil
⇑lines 9—8 underline "toujours ... accidentale"
⇑lines 9—8 annotation crystal
⇑lines 4—1 score
bottom-margin annotation Endosmos & Exosmos purely Physical action
Page 384
in pale pencil
whole-margin annotation The interruption of ordinary laws of chemical attraction most striking character of life
⇑lines 11—1 score
bottom-margin annotation (Other final cause)
Page 388
in pale pencil
⇑lines 16—3 double score
Page 392
in pale pencil
lines 6—9 score
Page 393
in pale pencil
⇑lines 12—1 double score