Pomologie physiologique

Uncorrected OCR	Machine-generated text. May include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Error-corrected OCR	Machine-generated, machine-corrected text. Better quality than Uncorrected OCR, but may still include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Manual Transcription	Human-created and reviewed text. For issues concerning manual transcription text, please contact the original holding institution.

Pages
Table of Contents

Cite This Publication

Page Link

View in Flickr

Scientific Names on this Page

Indexed by Global Names

Pomologie physiologique

Sageret, Michel.

Paris, Hizard, 1830

1830

https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.49977

Cambridge University Library

JISC & NEH

Rights:
Darwin Estate and Cambridge University Library

Copyright Status:
In copyright

Search Inside This Book:

Results For:

Click/Shift+Click pages to select for download

zoom out Zoom zoom in

Cancel Generate Review No Pages Added

Close Dialog

Review My PDF

List View Icon View

Close Dialog Finish

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Help Support BHL

BHL relies on donations to provide free PDF downloads and other services. Help keep BHL free and open!

Donate

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Email Address(required)

Include

Page images only Page images and text

Optional Article/Chapter Title

Author(s)

Example: Charles Darwin, Carl Linnaeus

Subject(s)

Example: Birds, Classification, Mammals

Contributed by Cambridge University Library

Annotation Not Available

bottom-margin annotation not in Darwin's handin brown ink Sageret [author's signature]

⇑lines 6—3 score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—13 score

subjects

concepts

lines 14—17 score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—13 score

subjects

concepts

lines 9—10 score
⇑lines 4—2 score

subjects

⇑lines 12—9 score
⇑lines 3—1 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—8 score
from annotation 16 effects of graft & 44 summing up—^t01

t01 - `& 44 ... up—' in dark pencil

subjects

concepts

whole-margin [?]score
lines 11—16 double score
lines 18—22 double score
lines 13—17 annotation in brown ink (Q)
from annotation 17. Sterility from grafting (Q)^t01

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 6—3 score
from annotation 43 «72» } seeds from grafted￭ Pear ^￭on Quince gives more varieties than on pure stock

subjects

concepts

whole-margin unmarked
from annotation 16 effects of graft & 44 summing up—^t01

t01 - `& 44 ... up—' in dark pencil

concepts

lines 8—10 score
⇑lines 11—7 score in pale pencil
⇑line 9 underline "variétés ... châtaignes"
⇑lines 2—1 score
from annotation 47 Contrasts the diminution of size in seeds of fruit-tree, with increase in size of nuts, Almonds & chestnuts, by selection

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 5—1 score in pale pencil
⇑line 4 underline "chose ... remarquable"
⇑lines 4—2 annotation in brown ink (Q)
bottom-margin annotation in pale pencil Coignassier is quince
from annotation 65 as odd as Crinum being more readily impregnated by foreign species^t01
from annotation 65 «222» some vars. of pears succeed better on Quince (Q)^t01 than on own stock (like case of Crinum) (Q)^t02

t01 - `being more ... species' in dark pencil

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

t02 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

lines 8—12 annotation in pale pencil “ ”

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—7 score

subjects

concepts

lines 3—6 score

subjects

concepts

lines 1—4 score

concepts

lines 8—12 score
from annotation 106 . The more a plant departs frm type the more tends to depart (contrast with opinion of limit)

concepts

lines 5—9 score
lines 5—6 annotation like hybridisation

concepts

lines 7—11 score
lines 12—13 annotation like Fuchsia
lines 14—17 score
lines 15—16 annotation in brown ink [?]Q
from annotation 126 on double fecundation in melon like Thwaites Inula case^t01

t01 - `like Thwaites ... case' in pale pencil

subjects

concepts

lines 5—6 score
lines 12—13 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 8—4 score

subjects

concepts

lines 2—16 score

concepts

lines 10—14 score
lines 16—18 score
⇑lines 8—1 score
from annotation 136 «(556)» on “variantes” or slight direct variation frm conditions

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 12—5 score
⇑lines 8—1 score

subjects

concepts

lines 11—17 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 8—6 score

concepts

lines 13—17 score
lines 17—19 score

subjects

concepts

lines 11—14 score

subjects

concepts

line 24 underline "datura stramonium"
bottom-margin annotation is it N. America?

subjects

concepts

lines 10—13 score
line 13 underline "crois ... plus"
line 10 annotation acclimatisation

concepts

bottom-margin →

lines 3—7 score
lines 9—15 score
⇑lines 7—4 score
from annotation 155 does not believe in acclimatisation , only in seedlings vegetating at different periods

subjects

concepts

lines 5—7 score

concepts

lines 13—16 score

concepts

lines 3—5 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—7 score in pale pencil

subjects

concepts

line 12 underline "arbres hybrides"
lines 16—18 score
lines 18—19 score

subjects

concepts

top-margin apparently unintentional mark

⇑lines 11—7 score
⇑lines 7—3 double score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—21 score
from annotation 218 on changes in fruit-trees

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 9—6 score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—21 score
lines 16—18 annotation in brown ink (Q)
from annotation 65 «222» some vars. of pears succeed better on Quince (Q)^t01 than on own stock (like case of Crinum) (Q)^t02

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

t02 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—2 double score

concepts

⇑lines 3—1 score
⇑lines 3—1 annotation ⸮

concepts

lines 1—5 score
line 2 annotation p. 252

subjects

concepts

lines 8—13 score

subjects

concepts

lines 2—11 score
lines 12—18 score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—14 score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—14 score

subjects

concepts

lines 13—16 score
lines 5—27 annotation in pale pencil How inexplicable that the improvements should suddenly stop, as soon as fruit gets arbitrarily good.—

subjects

concepts

lines 11—14 score in pale pencil

subjects

concepts

lines 1—5 score
lines 13—15 score
top-margin—line 15 annotation By selecting these poor seedlings, the race passes through many changes.— this perhaps explains it ; but then we must suppose that all th good old fruits have been sudden sports !!! or thy have been long individualy exposed to same conditions

subjects

lines 1—6 score
lines 7—10 score

subjects

concepts

lines 1—3 score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—13 score

subjects

concepts

⇑line 6 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 14—8 score

subjects

concepts

line 1 annotation “

concepts

bottom-margin annotation X Perhaps whole case resolves itself into that good fruits do not come in first generation — V. Mons choosing spiny plants has relation, Poiteau says, to their bearing early .

subjects

concepts

⇑line 1 annotation ”

concepts

lines 3—8 score

subjects

concepts

lines 11—14 score

subjects

concepts

lines 9—11 score

subjects

concepts

lines 16—19 score

subjects

concepts

lines 7—12 score

subjects

concepts

[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 2—1 score
⇑line 1 underline "leur espèce"
from annotation 262 on some pears & apples being true by seed

subjects

concepts

[continuation] 2—3 score
line 4 score
lines 14—16 score

subjects

concepts

lines 3—4 score

subjects

concepts

line 13 underline "Belges"
⇑lines 10—5 score

subjects

concepts

lines 7—9 score

concepts

lines 2—4 score
line 2 annotation X
top-margin—line 5 annotation Very true Van Mohn all bosh except so far better try successive seeds, seedlings than of established pears which may have been produced suddenly C.D.

subjects

concepts

[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 4—1 score

subjects

concepts

[continuation] 4 score
lines 5—9 score

subjects

concepts

lines 10—13 score
lines 10—13 score in pale pencil

subjects

concepts

lines 13—17 score

subjects

concepts

lines 14—17 score
lines 11—15 annotation I never knew what the paradise stock was

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—3 score

subjects

concepts

lines 3—8 )

subjects

concepts

lines 7—9 score cancelled

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 10—7 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 2—1 score

subjects

concepts

lines 3—6 score

subjects

concepts

lines 6—7 score

subjects

concepts

lines 15—17 score

subjects

concepts

line 17 underline "pêcher"
lines 18—21 score
line 18 underline "prunier"
from annotation 321 «346» } Peach «does not» succeeds equally well on all plums (Q)^t01

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 6—4 annotation in brown ink Q
⇑lines 4—1 score
from annotation 321 «346» } Peach «does not» succeeds equally well on all plums (Q)^t01

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

lines 1—4 score

subjects

concepts

lines 5—8 score
lines 9—12 score
lines 13—15 score
line 14 annotation for plums
from annotation 321 «346» } Peach «does not» succeeds equally well on all plums (Q)^t01

t01 - `(Q)' in brown ink

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—5 score
⇑lines 6—3 score
⇑lines 5—4 underline "Il ... d'abricotiers"
⇑lines 4—2 double score
⇑lines 4—2 annotation in brown ink (Q)

subjects

concepts

lines 1—4 score

subjects

concepts

lines 12—20 annotation Before rereadng this be sure look at Loudons Ency of Gardening p. 922.—

subjects

concepts

lines 16—20 score
line 17 annotation in reddish-brown crayon X
from annotation 358, 364 «367, 382» } Remarkable vars of cherries — good to quote as more than trifling

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 13—5 score
⇑lines 10—9 annotation in reddish-brown crayon 2 X
from annotation 358, 364 «367, 382» } Remarkable vars of cherries — good to quote as more than trifling

subjects

concepts

lines 2—4 score
lines 4—7 score
lines 3—5 annotation in reddish-brown crayon 3
lines 13—15 score
lines 14—17 annotation Monster
lines 17—19 score
lines 20—21 score
from annotation 358, 364 «367, 382» } Remarkable vars of cherries — good to quote as more than trifling

subjects

concepts

lines 4—5 score

subjects

concepts

⇑line 8 underline "soixante-quinze"

subjects

concepts

lines 3—5 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 5—3 score
⇑lines 5—4 underline "le ... nouveau"
⇑lines 5—4 annotation in reddish-brown crayon X

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 4—3 score
⇑lines 4—3 annotation ⸮

subjects

concepts

lines 14—17 score

subjects

concepts

lines 4—6 score
lines 4—6 annotation in reddish-brown crayon X
from annotation 358, 364 «367, 382» } Remarkable vars of cherries — good to quote as more than trifling

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—4 score

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 4—3 score
from annotation 398 Work on Gooseberry

subjects

concepts

lines 6—11 score

subjects

concepts

lines 12—16 score in pale pencil

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 8—3 score

subjects

concepts

lines 5—21 score cancelled

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 7—3 score

subjects

concepts

line 10 underline "Koelreuther"
⇑lines 5—1 score

subjects

concepts

lines 1—4 score

subjects

concepts

lines 16—19 score
lines 16—19 annotation ?

subjects

concepts

⇑lines 8—4 score
from annotation 136 «(556)» on “variantes” or slight direct variation frm conditions

concepts

[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 4—1 score

subjects

concepts

[continuation] 6—13 score

subjects

concepts

[continues overleaf] ⇑lines 4—1 score
⇑line 2 underline "non ... fusion"
from annotation 561 on characters of parents in Hybrids. (N.Q)

subjects

concepts

[continuation] 1—2 score
lines 3—7 double score

subjects

concepts

lines 2—3 score
line 3 underline "plus étonnante"

subjects

concepts

lines 17—20 score

concepts

⇑lines 5—1 score
from annotation (569, two Fathers)^t01

t01 - `two F' in brown ink over pencil

subjects

concepts

lines 10—15 score

subjects

concepts