dcsimg
Please read BHL's Acknowledgment of Harmful Content
FAQ
Close Dialog

Download citation


Close Dialog

Text Sources


Page text in BHL originates from one of the following sources:
Uncorrected OCR Machine-generated text. May include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Error-corrected OCR Machine-generated, machine-corrected text. Better quality than Uncorrected OCR, but may still include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Manual Transcription Human-created and reviewed text. For issues concerning manual transcription text, please contact the original holding institution.
  • Pages
  • Table of Contents
URL for Current Page
Scientific Names on this Page

Indexed by Global Names
Journal Title
Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science
By
Publication Details
London,
Year
1841
Holding Institution
Sponsor
Natural History Museum Library, London
Copyright & Usage
Copyright Status:
Public domain. The BHL considers that this work is no longer under copyright protection.


Search Inside This Book:
Results For:
Click/Shift+Click pages to select for download
Cancel Generate Review No Pages Added

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive the latest BHL news, content highlights, and promotions.

Subscribe

Help Support BHL

BHL relies on donations to provide free PDF downloads and other services. Help keep BHL free and open!

Donate

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

  
Optional
Example: Charles Darwin, Carl Linnaeus
Example: Birds, Classification, Mammals
Annotation Not Available

lines 49—54 score


lines 37—45 score
from End Slip 2 annotation 173 Owen intermediate fossils — 185 — 196 Summary on do

lines 44—47 score


line 23 underline "like ... a"
lines 21—27 score
lines 1—24 annotation this is like Waterhouses remark that low groups vary much,
from End Slip 1 annotation p. 181 Waterhouse — low in scale;
from End Slip 2 annotation 181 do — animals on confines of groups present great differences

lines 29—34 score
lines 29—51 annotation according to this, if there were many Monotremes, they wd vary much.—


lines 41—48 score
from End Slip 2 annotation 173 Owen intermediate fossils — 185 — 196 Summary on do

line 46 underline "Pleiosaurus"
line 46 annotation Enaliosaurians

lines 49—53 score
line 50 underline "other fishes"
line 50 annotation p.186

lines 53—54


lines 30—32 score


lines 36—41 score
lines 1—44 annotation As species are long lived (must be!!) so are genera — how is this in Mammifers Badger long—lived — Carnivora in Eocene


line 33 underline "terrestrial"
lines 31—49 annotation These cd have been np terrestrial Mammifers for 70 specimens of Iguanodons have been found


lines 9—11 score
from End Slip 2 annotation 173 Owen intermediate fossils — 185 — 196 Summary on do

lines 13—15 score

lines 20—22 score

lines 24—30 score

lines 36—38 score

lines 48—52 score


lines 21—25 score
lines 33—37 score
lines 1—35 annotation assumes the series to be perfect & a tendency to higher development —
from End Slip 2 annotation 197. Argument (Owen) against Transmutation — Resting on assumed rise in development — Grand discussion.—


lines 12—14 score
lines 12—42 annotation must confess even on my view imperfection of record surprising —

lines 22—25 score

lines 36—38 score

lines 8—2 score


lines 3—5 score

lines 7—9 score

lines 18—30 score

lines 32—44 score

lines 49—54 score


lines 1—8 score

lines 29—33 score

lines 45—51 score

whole-margin annotation Do those geologists who tacitly think the record pretty perfect — think that there were only 3 Mammifers during Oolitic & only . — Reptiles during Carboniferous & so many in Permean & Triassic


lines 22—25 score
from End Slip 2 annotation 201 Embryology of recent Reptiles resembles ancient

lines 36—41 score

lines 43—50 score


lines 6—8 score
lines 6—8 annotation Falconer

lines 11—15 score

lines 21—24 score


lines 44—50 score
lines 44—50 annotation ?
from End Slip 2 annotation 96 Different form of Vertebrae in ant & post part of column. Ch 7. Kinds of Transition.—