lines 18—20 score
lines 18—20 annotation ?
lines 2—11 score
from End Slip 1 annotation 62 curious coincidence in idea with what I have written
lines 2—12 score
lines 4—7 annotation American plants
lines 3—7 score
from End Note annotation 123 introduced Plants
lines 7—9 score
line 2 annotation p.231
from End Slip 2 annotation 175 It would be easy by this Table to calculate distribution by the 112 countries of census in larger & smaller genera. Take one of old lists with names. In order to see whether the most diffused species are the species of larger genera (see p.438)
line 42 annotation 1
line 9 annotation 4
line 10 annotation 131
line 12 annotation 2
line 13 annotation 100
line 14 annotation 1
line 16 annotation 1
line 2 underline "38 sub-provinces"
line 2 annotation counties
lines 20—30 score
line 29 underline "to 320"
lines 32—38 score
line 36 underline "partly fallacious"
bottom-margin apparently unintentional mark
line 1 annotation No of species
line 2 annotation World
lines 5—7 annotation Doubtful British species
line 1 annotation ?
from End Note annotation 397 misprint;
lines 13—18 score
lines 27—32 score
lines 31—32 underline "relative ... decreases"
lines 29—34 score
lines 31—32 underline "[most of line]"
line 34 underline "The ... orders"
lines 20—22 annotation & rate of growth
lines 25—31 score
lines 24—28 score
from End Slip 2 annotation 175 It would be easy by this Table to calculate distribution by the 112 countries of census in larger & smaller genera. Take one of old lists with names. In order to see whether the most diffused species are the species of larger genera (see p.438)
lines 21—25 score
lines 21—23 score
lines 21—23 annotation “ ”
lines 27—29 annotation “ ”
line 15 annotation [illegible]
line 3 annotation 1
line 4 annotation 2
line 5 annotation 8
line 7 annotation 3
line 8 annotation 13
line 9 annotation 19
line 10 annotation 4
line 11 annotation 6
line 12 annotation 26
line 21 apparently unintentional mark