dcsimg
Please read BHL's Acknowledgment of Harmful Content
Close Dialog

Text Sources

Page text in BHL originates from one of the following sources:
Uncorrected OCR Machine-generated text. May include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Error-corrected OCR Machine-generated, machine-corrected text. Better quality than Uncorrected OCR, but may still include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Manual Transcription Human-created and reviewed text. For issues concerning manual transcription text, please contact the original holding institution.
  • Pages
  • Table of Contents
Show More
URL for Current Page
 
Scientific Names on this Page

Indexed by Global Names
Book Title
über den Begriff der Pflanzenart und seine Anwendung
By
Bernhardi, Johann Jacob, 1774-1850
Publication Details
Erfurt, Friedrich Wilhelm Otto, 1834
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50399
Holding Institution
Cambridge University Library
Sponsor
JISC & NEH
Copyright & Usage
Rights:
Darwin Estate and Cambridge University Library

Copyright Status:
In copyright


Search Inside This Book:
Results For:
Click/Shift+Click pages to select for download
Cancel Generate Review No Pages Added
Close Dialog Finish Review My PDF

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive the latest BHL news, content highlights, and promotions.

Subscribe

Help Support BHL

BHL relies on donations to provide free PDF downloads and other services. Help keep BHL free and open!

Donate

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

  
Optional
Example: Charles Darwin, Carl Linnaeus
Example: Birds, Classification, Mammals
Contributed by Cambridge University Library
Annotation Not Available
Page vi
lines 11—14 annotation Denies th universal tendeny to avitism
⇑line 9 underline "Chelidonium laciniatum"
⇑lines 9—5 annotation has no tendeny to return to parent form. —
show subjects concepts
Page 2
line 15 underline "vereinige"
line 17 annotation ”
line 15 annotation joins
line 18 underline "Annahme"
line 18 annotation reception
Page 3
bottom-margin annotation There is no necessity accordng to my thery that new species shd have not descended frm several pairs
Page 4
lines 9—18 annotation unterart is in fact a doubtful species, probaly a species but vry little different frm other /
from End Slip annotation 4. Definition of various forms of species (Q)
⇑line 9—bottom-margin annotation "Abarten" a var. which does not tend to go back to parent form. "Spielarten", those that go back in one or more generations /
from End Slip annotation 4. Definition of various forms of species (Q)
bottom-margin annotation Does anyone think wild Pampas cattle identical with present stock.—
Page 5
lines 1—2 underline "Abänderungen"
lines 1—6 annotation Varieties which do not keep constant, or only in certain grounds.— /
line 3 at "unzweckmässig" annotation [?]unsuitable
lines 17—25 score
line 18 underline "so ... entstehen"
lines 17—23 annotation These several forms of species hard to distinguish.
bottom-margin annotation //
     Unterart subspecies = doubtful races or true ‹spec› close species
     Abarten — hereditary = races (or variety in animals)
     Spielarten whic ‹do not› are herditry for few generats — variety of Decandolles
     Abanderngen, whic are not at all hereditry — allied to Monstrsities
Page 6
⇑lines 4—1 score
⇑lines 4—3 annotation colour of Beet
show subjects subjects
⇑line 1 underline "Rumex ... nemorosus"
bottom-margin annotation compare these with
     Do thy not belong t sam Family?
Page 7
⇑line 13 underline "Rosa bicolor"
⇑line 12 underline "Rosa lutea Mill"
⇑line 10 underline "Bulbocapnos cavus"
⇑line 9 underline "einen niedrigern"
⇑lines 13—2 annotation 1st turns into last without sowing.    When colour more permanent, then accompanied by som slight changes just as Henslow thought wd be    See next Page —
⇑lines 8—5 score
bottom-margin annotation This bulbocapnos «(not in Spengler)» ‹wh› Cavus produced white seedlings.—
from End Slip annotation 7. slight differences going with white var.
bottom-margin apparently unintentional mark
Page 8
lines 12—19 annotation Differences of Anagallis phoenicea & arvensis.— not proved to be same.
⇑lines 8—6 score
⇑lines 9—1 annotation (Q)    anagallis collina has 2 coloured flowers, believes this thogh experiment not decisive.
from End Slip annotation 8 on Anagallis — argues for A. collina (Q)
Page 9
line 5 underline "A. carnea Schrauk"
lines 1—7 annotation (Q)    This came true //
show subjects concepts
lines 8—13 annotation fruit, taste & ‹sees› seed vary in colour & are often inherited.
line 18 underline "Phaseolus multiflorus"
lines 18—19 score
lines 18—19 annotation ⸮    colour of flower & seed go together
⇑lines 9—6 score
⇑lines 8—1 annotation doubling not change of organ , but simply increase of petals
Page 10
lines 1—10 annotation In Datura no loss of ‹peta› stamens (but may there not be potential stamens?)
show subjects subjects
lines 14—18 annotation on Hairs or coverng of Plants
Page 12
in dark pencil
line 9 underline "Trigonella coerulea"
lines 9—12 annotation var. with stalks of leaves    with leaflets,
show subjects subjects
⇑lines 8—5 score
⇑lines 8—2 annotation relative length of stamens good character in this ‹speci› Fam. but variable in Labiatae.—
⇑line 2 underline "Fragonaria monophylla"
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ one-leafed Strawberry is heredetary
from End Slip annotation 12    one-leafed Strawbery, heredetary
Page 13
in dark pencil
line 2 underline "folia terna"
line 2 annotation rarely inherited.
show subjects concepts
⇑line 12 underline "Caulis fasciatus"
show subjects subjects
⇑line 10 underline "Sedum cristatum"
⇑lines 10—8 annotation in this case in some degree hereditary.
show subjects subjects
show subjects concepts
⇑line 6 underline "Celosia cristata"
⇑lines 6—5 annotation Cockscomb example in flowers
show subjects subjects
show subjects concepts
⇑line 2 underline "Triticum compositum"
bottom-margin annotation ⧟ hereditary division of th flower stalk
Page 14
in dark pencil
lines 1—6 annotation Thickening of special parts, as in Cabbages & heading of Cabbages.
show subjects subjects
line 10 underline "Varietas laciniata"
line 12 underline "Vitis laciniosa"
line 12 underline "Sambucus"
line 13 underline "Sambucus nigra"
line 13 underline "Sambucus racemosa"
line 13 underline "Sambucus Ebulus"
lines 9—27 annotation Same variation affecting so many plants shows, how goes by laws. Lacination hereditry in Sambucus (& in Lettuce & Cabbage) so curled, blistered, &c
from End Slip annotation 14    on lacinated and curled leaves common to many genera
lines 16—17 underline "von ... Blättchen"
lines 12—17 annotation not hereditary
line 20 underline "Chelidonium laciniatum"
line 21 underline "erhält ... bei"
⇑line 4 underline "Varietas crispa"
⇑line 3 underline "bullata"
Page 15
in dark pencil
line 1 score
top-margin annotation curled leaves of natural species more regular
show subjects subjects
lines 3—7 annotation Curled mint by seed had its first leaves not curled.— /
show subjects subjects
line 7 underline "Varietas tortuosa"
lines 10—11 annotation ⧟ partly hereditary
line 13 underline "Veronica cristata"
lines 12—15 annotation petals only curled    inherited
line 16 double score in pencil [`bookmark']
line 18 underline in pencil "Capsella Bursa"
lines 18—19 annotation in pencil leaves of in same situation
show subjects concepts
Page 16
line 1 unmarked
top-margin annotation variety of Paeony with small leaves
show subjects subjects
lines 12—15 annotation Is there any Linaria with regular Corolla
show subjects subjects
⇑line 1 underline "auf ... Boden"
bottom-margin annotation on rich ground leaves of involucra? end in spikes
show subjects subjects
Page 18
line 2 underline "strauchartige"
line 2 annotation bush-like
Page 19
lines 1—4 score cancelled
line 1 underline "Hibiscus ... vitifolius"
lines 2—3 underline "zwei ... setzen"
lines 8—10 score
line 9 underline "Kölreuter ... nahm"
lines 8—10 annotation Probable mistake of Kolreuter's
⇑lines 7—1
⇑line 7 annotation X
⇑line 7—bottom-margin annotation See to this    D. stramonium & ferox might be quite fertile, but D. tatula & ferox are not quite. but D. stramn & tatula are.    If I understand he only assumes about D. Stramonium & ferox
Page 20
⇑lines 7—1 score in pale pencil
bottom-margin annotation When intermediate forms found «together» always necessry t bear in mind th chance of their being hybrids —
Page 21
bottom-margin annotation If th intermediate forms kept constant then one must be considered an "abart" of th other; if thy went back t both parent forms, then thy shd be considered as Vars. ‹of› were result of external conditions ‹of› on th two parents ;which wd be subspecies
Page 22
line 15 underline "Lawsonia ... anomala"
line 16 annotation X
lines 14—18 annotation Organs of these plants make great differences
Page 26
⇑line 4 double score [`bookmark']
Page 27
line 19 double score [`bookmark']
Page 28
⇑line 3 underline "Datura ... Tatula"
⇑line 3 annotation (a)
bottom-margin annotation (a) Doubtful Whether these varieties, because other species differ in same, but greater degree.—
Page 29
line 13 score [`bookmark']
bottom-margin annotation Those who are not naturalists think species a well defined entity; show the distinctions of Bernhardi; of Decaisne & Hooker.— H.C. Watsons classification of British close species — Then th difference of numbers — Then cases of certain well known genera as Land-shells & Rats — then such flagrant cases as th 2 Oaks — all this difficulty explicable on my theory. depends only on ignorance if creations.—
Page 30
line 14 underline "Gründen ... Retz"
line 18 underline "Aussaat ... sanguinale"
lines 14—17 annotation (Q)    turns after repeated sowing into —
from End Slip annotation 30 on Panicum ciliare turn into P. sanguinale (Q)
lines 20—24 annotation V Steudel to see whether admitted
show subjects concepts
⇑line 1 underline "glatte ... tectorum"
⇑line 1 at "Abart" annotation does not change durng 12 years
show subjects subjects
Page 31
line 2 underline "Br. murorum
line 2 annotation nor this
show subjects subjects
line 5 underline "Abart des"
lines 6—7 annotation this also true
line 11 double score [`bookmark']
Page 32
line 2 score
line 6 underline "Aira capillaris"
lines 5—13 annotation This is A. caryopllea, when it flower 1st year, & differs in only one floret being awned.—    leaves smaller
line 14 underline "A. saxatilis"
show subjects subjects
Page 35
⇑lines 3—2 underline "Dactylis abbreviata"
bottom-margin annotation changed in 3d sowing to D. glomerata —
from End Slip annotation 35 on vars. of some grasses vry constant
Page 36
line 2 annotation X
show subjects concepts
Page 39
⇑lines 7—3 score
from End Slip annotation 39 a hybrid grass— rare case
Page 40
lines 2—3 score
line 2 underline "hat ... nicht"
show subjects concepts
Page 44
⇑lines 9—8 unmarked
⇑lines 10—8 annotation wild Cruciferae vary much
show subjects subjects
⇑line 6 underline "Matthiola ... annua"
⇑line 2 underline "M. glabra"
⇑lines 6—4 annotation probably vars
Page 45
line 9 apparently unintentional mark
line 13 underline "Erysimum hieracifolium"
line 14 underline "virgatum Roth"
lines 14—21 annotation scarcely abarten much less good species being cultivated from seed
from End Slip annotation horizontally crossed 45 Erysimum strictum    not true
Page 46
line 3 score [`bookmark']
lines 4—6 score
line 7 underline "verdächtiger"
line 7 annotation suspected
Page 50
line 8 underline "angustifolium"
lines 8—13 annotation Kept true for 6 generations, but Steudel makes var. of L. Gallicum
lines 16—18 score
line 16 underline "P. laciniata"
line 18 underline "P. magna"
lines 16—19 annotation From this seed gave P. magna (Steudel makes var of P. magna—
from End Slip annotation 50 on a Pimpinella — being on a var.
Page 66
lines 5—7 score
lines 4—8 annotation In Veronica colours blue or red & some changeable
show subjects subjects
line 13 underline "laxiflora"
line 13 annotation changed its colour
line 15 underline "V. paludosa"/ lines 16—18 annotation seedlings changed colour
from End Slip annotation 66 seedlings of Veronica changed colour —
⇑line 7 underline "Anagallis"
⇑line 6 underline "agrestis"
⇑line 6—bottom-margin annotation Red vars. of these ‹of› blue Angallis kept true for 10 generations but may be thought true species; but he seems to think other differences trivial.—
from End Slip annotation ― on vars of Veronica keeping true for 10 generations —
Page 67
⇑lines 10—6 score
⇑lines 10—2 annotation when colour of flowers alters; so foliage; & when less colour, plant smaller.
Page 68
lines 17—21 score
lines 12—28 annotation Like Rubus case & Hieracium.t01
     The abarten with red flowers from these 6 species differ from their stammarten in analogous way
from End Slip annotation 68    3 vars with analogous differences
t01 - `Like Rubus ... Hieracium' in dark pencil